search for: intransparent

...t at llvm.org if needed. I have slight reservations towards this. A general conduct email is good, but there are cases where you would like to contact individuals. This is for example, when the report goes against a member of the conduct team itself or the LLVM core team - for the reporter, it is intransparent whether that person is included in (contact at llvm.org) or if they are openly, might resort from reporting. This is not a constructed thing, I had such cases. I can also recommend the approach taken by cfgmgmtcamp.eu, which provides contacts to people outside of the organisation in case of issue...

> On 2 Apr 2015, at 06:41, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > >> On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 00:51 -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: >> >> In my opinion, assigning sub-version numbers to what was originally >> intended to be, by Red Hat, quarterly updates (almost Service Packs, >> if you will, much like SGI's numbering of their Foundation and