search for: intransitive

Aloha all, I have an adjacency matrix for an acyclic digraph that contains transitive relations, e.g. (u,v), (v,w), (u,w). I want a DAG with only intransitive relations. Can someone point me to an R function that will take my adjacency matrix and give me back one with only intransitive relations? In the example, I'd like to get rid of (u,w) and keep (u,v) and (v,w). All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com

...an anyone help with scripting the commands below? 1. Add/create a new column to df and name it as ShortPause . 2. Convert ShortPause as a factor variable. 3. ShortPause will have two levels (short and long). Assign short if pause is smaller than 0.1, and assign long otherwise. 4. How many ?syntax==intransitive? observations were realized with a tap (tapped==Tapped)? (Use xtabs() and ftable() to calculate this.) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ciple.ouroborus.net (http://disciple.ouroborus.net)). We are looking to make use of LLVM's type-based alias analysis metadata to encode non-aliasing information between variables. We have found that the tbaa structure is somewhat limited in its expressivity. In particular we couldn't encode intransitive relations such as "no-alias", e.g. (x `no-alias` y) and (y `no-alias` z) but not (x `no-alias` z), where x, y and z are all variables (not types). As an example, consider the following contrived piece of code, in which we assume (b `no-alias` d) and (c `no-alias` d): %1 = load i32* %b...

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. Changes since 4.19.6 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function (ldb 2.8.1 is already released). ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances (ldb 2.8.1 is already ???? released). o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 156...

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. Changes since 4.19.6 -------------------- o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function (ldb 2.8.1 is already released). ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances (ldb 2.8.1 is already ???? released). o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 156...

...--------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15662: vfs_widelinks with DFS shares breaks case insensitivity. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 13213: Samba build is not reproducible. ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function. ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15638: Need to change gitlab-ci.yml tags in all branches to avoid CI ???...

...--------- o? Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15662: vfs_widelinks with DFS shares breaks case insensitivity. o? Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> ?? * BUG 13213: Samba build is not reproducible. ?? * BUG 15569: ldb qsort might r/w out of bounds with an intransitive compare ???? function. ?? * BUG 15625: Many qsort() comparison functions are non-transitive, which can ???? lead to out-of-bounds access in some circumstances. o? Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> ?? * BUG 15638: Need to change gitlab-ci.yml tags in all branches to avoid CI ???...