search for: intrans

I've added logs (dirty and quickly): logging { channel "request" { file "/var/named/named.run" size 10m; print-time yes; print-category yes; severity debug; }; category default { request; }; category security { request; }; }; Reload DNS service using systemctl once, twice, then restart Bind, reload it using rndc and no complain about log file and

Hum... what are these logs related to GeoIP? Perhaps this answer will be a bit rough... anyway: MS AD is complex. Samba team did a great job to reproduce its behaviour but MS product are not reputed to be too stable, so a work-in-progress reproduction of such tool has few chances to be too stable. DNS is complex by itself, especially when using Bind as backend: Bind can do lot of things related

Hello! After updating (only one dc) for samba 4.5.3 is occurring duplicate zone errors, when I run rndc reload Samba_dlz: Ignoring duplicate zone This replied to all my dcs ... When I run: Samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names I get the error Update failed: NOTAUTH .... .... Update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2 Failed update of 21 entries Like this topic to have reference to this,

Using your log parameters, the shutting down message is not showed, but when I reload rndc a get the same effect. Everything is working fine until bond9_dlz needs to reload (and no restart) rndc. When this happens, I need to restart bind and everything works fine again. I'm starting named with named -d 3 -u named and using /var/log/messages. See log using your parameters: # rndc reload

Mathias, Thanks for your reply. Please, try to start your bind with some debug level and run commando "rndc reload" and see the end of the log. I saw samba source code and found the destroy dns function in dlz_bind9.c and called by turture blz_bind9.c. When dlz_bind9.c is shutting down, I get this error when I try to update dns. update failed: NOTAUTH Failed nsupdate: 2

I will get a smbd process started. (If this is incorrect please let me know ;) But this morning I did a quick ps -ax on my machine and found *two* smbd -D in the process list. But as far as I know there is no connection to the samba server right now. I did connect to and disconnect from the server yesterday but I would think that that connection would have been released by now. Can anyone

Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA dev people.. Regards, Marc. Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com