search for: intoducing

Hello, I have a very data matrix and I have a file which has the names that I need to subset. However I cannot manage to subset the main file. ANy idea? bg <- read.table (file.choose(), header=T, row.names) bg Otu00022 Otu00029 Otu00039 Otu00042 Otu00101 Otu00105 Otu00125 Otu00131 Otu00137 Otu00155 Otu00158 Otu00172 Otu00181 Otu00185 Otu00190 Otu00209 Otu00218 Gi20Jun11 0.001217

On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > >> My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place >> where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter, >> >> raw_local_irq_save(); /* or other IRQs off without tracing */ >> ... >> kvm_wait() /* IRQ state tracing gets confused

On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > >> My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place >> where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter, >> >> raw_local_irq_save(); /* or other IRQs off without tracing */ >> ... >> kvm_wait() /* IRQ state tracing gets confused

...t; Maybe you can disable pirq_set_affinity to have a try with the > > following patch. It may trigger IRQ migration in hypervisor, > > and the IRQ migration logic about(especailly > > shared)level-triggered ioapic IRQ is not well tested because > > of no users before. After intoducing the pirq_set_affinity in > > #Cset21625, the logic is used frequently when vcpu migration > > occurs, so I doubt it maybe expose the issue you met. > > Besides, there is a bug in event driver which is fixed in > > latest pv_ops dom0, seems the dom0 you are using doesn'...

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 09:57:55AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > > > > > My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place > > > where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter, > > > > > > raw_local_irq_save(); /* or

Hello list, I started playing aroud with Comstar in snv_134. In snv_116 version of ZFS, a new hidden property for the Comstar MetaData has been intoduced (stmf_sbd_lu). This makes it possible to migrate from legacy (iscsi target daemon) to Comstar without data loss, which is great. Before this property you always lost the first 64k of your zvol data where comstar wrote it''s metadata -

On 11.08.20 10:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 09:57:55AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: >> On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: >>> >>>> My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place >>>> where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter,

On 11.08.20 10:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 09:57:55AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: >> On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: >>> >>>> My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place >>>> where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter,

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place > where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter, > > raw_local_irq_save(); /* or other IRQs off without tracing */ > ... > kvm_wait() /* IRQ state tracing gets confused */ > ... > raw_local_irq_restore(); > > and therefore,

Hi Folks, Is there a way to find out the mobile/landline carrier name based on the phone number? For example, who is the mobile carrier for (415)2345678 I had heard about some query but just don't remember how/what? Thanks in advance. Ritesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I am a complete newbie to dovecot, but do have reasonable experience in compiling Unix/Linux software. I am currently trying to do a cross-compile of dovecot-2.29.1 to be used on my home office Thecus NAS (host: Thecus kernel 2.6.33 on 32-bit Intel Atom: "i686-nptl-linux-gnu"; my build machine has Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS) "from ground up", i.e. I need to build and

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:42PM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > > Shouldn't we __always_inline those? They're going to be really small. > > I can send a v2, and you can choose. For reference, though: > > ffffffff86271ee0 <arch_local_save_flags>: > ffffffff86271ee0: 0f 1f 44 00 00

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 03:42PM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > > Shouldn't we __always_inline those? They're going to be really small. > > I can send a v2, and you can choose. For reference, though: > > ffffffff86271ee0 <arch_local_save_flags>: > ffffffff86271ee0: 0f 1f 44 00 00