search for: intion

...bout different linker semantics. I assume the "--warn-backrefs by default" we're discussing is only related to the ld.lld frontend? Not the Windows linker lld behavior (or ld64 (old or new) lld behavior)? Yes, the ELF port (lld/ELF). No other port has implemented --warn-backrefs. The intion of --warn-backrefs is to capture behavior differences with GNU ld's ELF ports. If traditional ELF linkers don't behave like that, I can replace "traditional ELF linkers" in https://reviews.llvm.org/D86762 with "GNU linkers". >> >> >> >> > On T...

...e "--warn-backrefs by default" we're >> discussing is only related to the ld.lld frontend? Not the Windows linker >> lld behavior (or ld64 (old or new) lld behavior)? >> >> Yes, the ELF port (lld/ELF). No other port has implemented >> --warn-backrefs. The intion of --warn-backrefs is to capture behavior >> differences with GNU ld's ELF ports. If traditional ELF linkers don't >> behave like that, I can replace "traditional ELF linkers" in >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D86762 with "GNU linkers". >> >> &...

...;> >> discussing is only related to the ld.lld frontend? Not the Windows >> linker >> >> lld behavior (or ld64 (old or new) lld behavior)? >> >> >> >> Yes, the ELF port (lld/ELF). No other port has implemented >> >> --warn-backrefs. The intion of --warn-backrefs is to capture behavior >> >> differences with GNU ld's ELF ports. If traditional ELF linkers don't >> >> behave like that, I can replace "traditional ELF linkers" in >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D86762 with "GNU linkers...

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:16 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Would you like to conduct the conversation here, or on the review thread? (I lean towards having them here, but don't mind if folks feel like it keeps the noise down & want to more post a notice saying "hey, here's this thing, if you're interested, go discuss it over there" -

...the ld.lld frontend? Not the Windows >> >> linker >> >> >> lld behavior (or ld64 (old or new) lld behavior)? >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, the ELF port (lld/ELF). No other port has implemented >> >> >> --warn-backrefs. The intion of --warn-backrefs is to capture behavior >> >> >> differences with GNU ld's ELF ports. If traditional ELF linkers don't >> >> >> behave like that, I can replace "traditional ELF linkers" in >> >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D8...

...>> >> linker >> >> >> >> lld behavior (or ld64 (old or new) lld behavior)? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, the ELF port (lld/ELF). No other port has implemented >> >> >> >> --warn-backrefs. The intion of --warn-backrefs is to capture >> behavior >> >> >> >> differences with GNU ld's ELF ports. If traditional ELF linkers >> don't >> >> >> >> behave like that, I can replace "traditional ELF linkers" in >> >>...

...t;>> >> >> >> lld behavior (or ld64 (old or new) lld behavior)? >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> Yes, the ELF port (lld/ELF). No other port has implemented >>>> >> >> >> --warn-backrefs. The intion of --warn-backrefs is to capture >>>> behavior >>>> >> >> >> differences with GNU ld's ELF ports. If traditional ELF >>>> linkers don't >>>> >> >> >> behave like that, I can replace "traditional ELF lin...