Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "intertwingly".
Did you mean:
interstingly
2009 Apr 29
0
XML Builder - problems with serialized ruby
...gem to transform an array/hash that contains
serialized ruby. Builder''s to_xs method seems to mangle serialized
ruby though. I can get around this by encoding/decoding with base 64,
but that doesn''t seem like a good path to follow.
Builder is using this code for escaping: http://intertwingly.net/stories/2005/09/28/xchar.rb
Any ideas on how to modify that, so serialized ruby will be escaped
properly?
Thanks,
Matt
2009 Aug 23
5
Upgrading to 2.3 from 2.1
Can be done in a one step process or do I have to upgrade to 2.2 then
2.3?
Thanks for the help.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2006 Sep 26
12
resource_feeder feedback
...olumns in a database are simply plain
text. That also tends to be the ''safe'' choice in most cases; treating
markup as plain text will expose the markup. This , while suboptimal,
at least is obvious. In the reverse case, what you have is silent data
loss [6].
[6] http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2004/05/28/detente
If you want to put plain text in an RSS 1.0 or RSS 2.0 <description>,
and you are using Builder 2.0 (you *are* using Builder 2.0, aren''t
you?), then you need to add a .to_xs to escape the string. If you want
to put plain text into an Atom <summary&...
2009 May 23
9
undefined method `assert_select'
I''m having trouble getting the specs to run for a plugin where I want to
fix a bug. (I''ve actually already found and fixed the bug, but I don''t
want to submit a fix without a test!) When I started the specs weren''t
running, but it may be that I''m using Rails 2.3.3 and the plugin has
been tested on 2.1 and earlier. I went through writing a spec for a