Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "intersitetopologygenerator".
2020 Jul 14
3
Replication only working one way
...AILURE
SUMMARY
---------
Attributes found only in ldap://genesis:
dSASignature
serverReference
Attributes with different values:
msDS-NC-Replica-Locations
extraColumns
mS-DS-ReplicatesNCReason
adminPropertyPages
appliesTo
attributeDisplayNames
masteredBy
interSiteTopologyGenerator
adminContextMenu
msDs-masteredBy
classDisplayName
revision
* Comparing [SCHEMA] context...
* DN lists have different size: 1789 != 1569
CN=Dns-Zone-Scope,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=kcs,DC=local
Genesis is, I believe, correct. Is there a way to force Luke to update
itself f...
2020 Jul 14
0
Replication only working one way
...>
> ? ? dSASignature
> ? ? serverReference
>
> Attributes with different values:
>
> ? ? msDS-NC-Replica-Locations
> ? ? extraColumns
> ? ? mS-DS-ReplicatesNCReason
> ? ? adminPropertyPages
> ? ? appliesTo
> ? ? attributeDisplayNames
> ? ? masteredBy
> ? ? interSiteTopologyGenerator
> ? ? adminContextMenu
> ? ? msDs-masteredBy
> ? ? classDisplayName
> ? ? revision
>
> * Comparing [SCHEMA] context...
>
> * DN lists have different size: 1789 != 1569
> CN=Dns-Zone-Scope,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=kcs,DC=local
>
> Genesis is, I believe, correct....
2019 Oct 02
3
Removed a DC but...
Hai,
The steps shown here dont work?
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Demoting_a_Samba_AD_DC
If that is the case and you besides that free of errors.
Then upgrade, and try again once your on at least samba 4.9 or 4.10.
As im hoping you are upgrade straight to Buster.
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
...3bee9>;<RMD_LOCAL_USN=202812>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=73108>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=VDCUD1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it
Not removing dangling forward link
ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for interSiteTopologyGenerator in object CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it - <GUID=bdab9051-0882-40ec-bf6e-b223e4adecd8>;CN=NTDS Settings,CN=VDCUD1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it
Not removing dangli...
2019 Oct 02
0
Removed a DC but...
...<RMD_FLAGS=> 0>;<RMD_INVOCID=5e88c5bf-578b-4ac7-9bee-59d19d1b6b06>;<RMD_LOC
> AL_USN=202866>;<RMD_ORIGINATING_USN=42832>;<RMD_VERSION=0>;CN=
UDINE,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it
> ERROR: no target object found for GUID component for
> interSiteTopologyGenerator in object CN=NTDS Site
> Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,
DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it - <GUID=bdab9051-0882-40ec-bf6e-> b223e4adecd8>;CN=NTDS
> Settings,CN=VDCUD1,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Si
tes,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=fvg,DC=lnf,DC=it...
2019 Oct 02
2
Removed a DC but...
On 02/10/2019 14:42, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote:
> Mandi! Rowland penny via samba
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>>> samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix
>>> Yes, should be possible, but i normaly do that after i do the following.
>> Yes, but why wasn't it removed in the first place ?
> [...]
>>> Run :
>>> dig CNAME
2020 Jul 14
2
Replication only working one way
OK, tried that. Kicked myself for not trying earlier... but it didn't
work.
In fact, the error has got worse.
Now when I try to go from Genesis to Luke I get:
sudo samba-tool drs replicate luke genesis DC=kcs,DC=local -Udomainadmin
.
.
ERROR(<class 'samba.drs_utils.drsException'>): DsReplicaSync failed -
drsException: DsReplicaSync failed (1359, 'WERR_INTERNAL_ERROR')
2016 Sep 23
6
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 9/22/2016 6:31 PM, Garming Sam wrote:
> On 23/09/16 00:59, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote:
>> For clarification I'll add a few things.
>>
>> I initially deleted all the NTDS site links for each site and allowed
>> the new KCC to create them. However it did not create them I believe
>> correctly. By that I mean it defined what appeared to be a bridgehead