search for: interrups

Hi list, I would like to know if the following rsync's behavior can be changed/modified. I noticed that when rsync receive a file for which the local filesystem already has a symlinks with the same path/name, it _first_ delete the symlink, _then_ it start the transfer. I think there are two problems with this approach: - it completely ignores the content of the symlinked files, which can

At the same site, DTMF recognition is functioning badly, sometimes duplicating digits and sometimes totally missing others. We have checked already /proc/interrups, there is no interrupt being shared. Our zaptel has .. span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 On zapata we have ... switchtype=euroisdn signalling=pri_cpe relaxdtmf=no (yes doesn't seem to help) -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com...

Hi, As was discussed earlier in another thread and as documented in R-exts .Call() should not be interruptible by Ctrl-C. However the following code, which spends most of its time inside mkChar, turned out to be interruptible on RH-7.3 R-1.8.1 gcc-2.96: #include <Rinternals.h> #include <R.h> SEXP foo0(const SEXP nSexp) { int i, n; SEXP resSexp; if (!isInteger(nSexp))

All, just having spotted the backport of Linux commit 03bbcb2e I notice a certain discrepancy with the Xen commit having the same purpose as well as with the actual specification updates: The Linux solution keys off of device IDs 3403 and 3406, as listed in the specification update, but this way fails to cover the X58 chipset, which has - under different numbers (62 and 69) - the same errata

Hi All I have a problem with initialization of asterisk using my rc.local file. when i call asterisk from the prompt it works well but don?t in the initialization... I have in my file that comands: touch /var/lock/subsys/local modprobe zaptel modprobe wcfxo safe_asterisk I read in somewere that it can be an interrup problem and i use the cat proc/interrupt to see what is happening Somebody

I''m running Xen on a dual xeon system at the moment and somehow the results are a bit less than what i expected. I’ve started to do some monitoring on it to see how bad it is. you can see for yourself on: http://core.zokahn.com/cs-01/ I''ve installed Xen 2.0 using the howto in howtoforge: http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect_xen_setup_debian_ubuntu This virtual machine is running 2

Hi, has anyone succesfully installed such scenario ? I'm having problem with Award bios mb pc's... it do works with others, what's your idea ? Tnx ! -- Best regards, Alessio mailto:afoc@interconnessioni.it

...tincd on three desktops, two are used as servers because they have an static IP. The third is a Laptop with various Lan's. Everything works fine, as long as all two servers are running, the Laptop connect to both servers. When one server becomes anavailable, the connections to the other server interrups every 30 secondeds when tinc trys to connect to the server that is not running. I tried nearly every configuration but the problems still there. Hope you can help me ( with the Problem, not with my bad English ) Greetz from Germany Gerald Rehage To prevent any mistakes here are the config...

hello out of curiosity as I wanted to achieve this some time before - i.e. to performing automated backup od samba domain. now I've tried to use kerberos - for online backup (within script) I have used: samba-tool domain backup online --targetdir=${BACKUPDIR} --server=${DCSERVER} --krb5-ccache=${KRB5CCNAME} but seems this is not working as the backup process is interruped in the middle

...I understand correctly, this will cause these IRQs to be forwarded >>> directly to the VCPU, e.g. will be handled by the guest/qemu. >> >> Yes, if it can bypassed, the interrupt will be delivered to vCPU directly. >> > So, usually the network driver knows how to handle interrups for its > devices. I assume the virtio_net driver at the guest has some default > processing but what if the underlying hardware device (such as the case > of vdpa) needs to take some actions? Virtio splits the bus operations out of device operations. So did the driver. The virtio-net...

...ack.source != hvm_intsrc_pic && + intack.source != hvm_intsrc_vector ) + { + unsigned long status = __vmread(GUEST_INTR_STATUS); + + /* + * Set eoi_exit_bitmap for periodic timer interrup to cause EOI-induced VM + * exit, then pending periodic time interrups have the chance to be injected + * for compensation + */ + if (pt_vector != -1) + vmx_set_eoi_exit_bitmap(v, pt_vector); + + /* we need update the RVI field */ + status &= ~(unsigned long)0x0FF; + status |= (unsigned long)0x0FF & +...

Thanks Louis; /etc/krb5.conf [libdefaults] default_realm = EXAMPLE.COM dns_lookup_realm = false dns_lookup_kdc = true /etc/resolv.conf search example.com nameserver 192.168.50.40 /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost samba4.example.com 192.168.50.40 samba4.example.com samba4 ldap.example.com Output off: samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs NOTE: old (due to rename

about that systemd part.   systemctl daemon-reload systemctl samba-ad-dc stop   clear the logs in /va/log/samba   systemctl samba-ad-dc start   and and extra check on the dns part. sudo /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose and check your logs again to make sure your all ok.   Greetz,   Louis   Van: Sergio Belkin [mailto:sebelk at gmail.com] Verzonden: woensdag 12 december 2018 14:16 Aan:

On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 29/10/2020 14:43, Marco Shmerykowsky via samba wrote: >> I want to setup a backup AD DC and have a few quick >> (possibly dumb) questions: > No, you just want to add another DC >> >> 1) Is this link the best reference to the procedure to >> ?? create the backup AD DC? >> >> -> >>

Hi, I wonder about the performance of a Linux box used as router (I guest I''m not the first :). Althought I know it mainly depends on the hardware, I''m trying to find some references on the topic or comparations with other routing solutions (FreeBSD box used as router, Cisco, etc). For example, http://facweb.cti.depaul.edu/jyu/Publications/Yu-Linux-TSM2004.pdf (althought is

This includes two kernel patches, scsi-target and IO_CMD_EPOLL_WAIT. The former is a modified version of the scsi target infrastructure in mainline. The latter enables applications to handle AIO and non-AIO fds in the same loop. blktap uses the different patch, AIO event queue patch for the same aim. The IO_CMD_EPOLL_WAIT patch will be merged into mainline (and the AIO event queue will not) so