search for: interprocess

Hi, I've been lurking for a while now with a view to starting work on wine - specifically COM and DCOM. I know some people have started some work and there might be some patent issues with COM at least - so maybe DCOM is a better bet (I had the possibly niave idea of implementing COM via DCOM - it would be almost transparent, slower but less "dangerous"). I've read most of the

Hai, I snapped this part of you logs. > Successful AuthZ: [DCE/RPC,krb5] user [COMPANY]\[DC6$] [S-1-5-21-2660373802-310620142-1895175072-6626] at [Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:16:20.224329 PDT] Remote host [ipv4:10.14.16.11:35006] local host [ipv4:10.12.16.11:49153] > [2019/04/26 10:16:23.503632, 0] ../../source4/lib/cmdline/popt_common.c:74(popt_s4_talloc_log_fn) > Bad talloc magic value

...on?c? C++? >> > If I thought C was an appropriate choice to get this done, I'd be > patching the expect source code instead to deal with Microsoft's > non-implementation of POSIX. > > If a language conceals the differences between POSIX and Microsoftian C > for interprocess control, hides badly non-POSIX filepaths from me, and > has a reasonable track record of forward compatibility, and has a > reasonably universal build process, I'll consider crash-learning the > language if I'm not already working in it. For my test suite I use Tcl (with TclX,...

HI I have been working with NT, Samba and win 9x for a couple of years. Any time an NT server is set to Domain security, or a Samba server is set to anything but share level security I have problems. My problem is this. I want to allow a diverse groupe of machines to connect to the samba server using user level access, but it always askes me for a password to connect to \\SERVER\IPC$, but no

...hat, something else. > Python?c? C++? > If I thought C was an appropriate choice to get this done, I'd be patching the expect source code instead to deal with Microsoft's non-implementation of POSIX. If a language conceals the differences between POSIX and Microsoftian C for interprocess control, hides badly non-POSIX filepaths from me, and has a reasonable track record of forward compatibility, and has a reasonably universal build process, I'll consider crash-learning the language if I'm not already working in it. [I do some programming in Python already. Python lost...

On Jul 30, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Kenneth Boyd <zaimoni at zaimoni.com> wrote: > I've been thinking of constructing a mirror test suite coordinated > using > shell scripts (bash) Please no, pick a real language. I love bash and it is fine for any 200 line or less program, but for much beyond that, something else. Python?c? C++?

"Geoffrey L. Hausheer" wrote: > > So not to beat a dead horse or anything, but after seeing Gavriel's note > that InstallShield was working in the latest Transgaming patch (I have no > need of the Direct3d stuff, but I was not able to find any relevant pattches > by Andreas on PATCHES), I installed the patch, and tried out installing > MediaPlayer yet again, and

...m trying > not to let personal preference get in the way. :) Neither I do. This sub-thread started with a discussion about the feasibility of leaving behing DejaGNU and using `bash' instead or: > > If a language conceals the differences between POSIX and Microsoftian C > > for interprocess control, hides badly non-POSIX filepaths from me, and > > has a reasonable track record of forward compatibility, and has a > > reasonably universal build process, I'll consider crash-learning the > > language if I'm not already working in it. Then I proposed Tcl as an ex...

...> If I thought C was an appropriate choice to get this done, I'd be > > patching the expect source code instead to deal with Microsoft's > > non-implementation of POSIX. > > > > If a language conceals the differences between POSIX and Microsoftian C > > for interprocess control, hides badly non-POSIX filepaths from me, and > > has a reasonable track record of forward compatibility, and has a > > reasonably universal build process, I'll consider crash-learning the > > language if I'm not already working in it. > > For my test suite I...

...R_CID_LOCAL (i.e. using the reserved 1) and > implement > > > loopback in the core. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > What kind of use cases are mentioned in the KVM forum for loopback? > One concern > > is that we have to maintain yet another interprocess communication > mechanism, > > even though other choices exist already (and those are likely to be more > efficient > > given the development time and specific focus that went into those). To > me, the > > local connections are mainly useful as a way to sanity test the p...

I've got an idea for a program, and after readig about 1/3 of your documentation, I think LLVM is what I'm looking for. What I'd like now is some help to see if my idea is "sane" and and shed light and direction that could be provided. I want to build a simplified "Virtual Machine" containing: A Terminal Hard Drives (image files) Some Kind Of Networking Device

...ing difficulty understanding how to navigate a heavily denormalized hierarchy. Could someone direct me to a bare-bones explanation of using rails to navigate database hierarchies? I am an experienced developer. Most of my work has been desktop client server, high performance, or server to server interprocess work in large scale systems (8K plus users). However, I am new to Ruby and the rails environment. Furthermore, I have never been comfortable with html development. My idea of a perfect screen is plain white that is sparsely populated with black text with a single font and no effects. The defaul...

...d versions as you’ve requested. This version list > is from DC4, with your packages. > > ubuntu at dc4:~$ dpkg -l |egrep > "samba|winbin|?db|tevent|talloc|nss|wrapper" > ii dbus 1.12.2-1ubuntu1 > amd64 simple interprocess messaging > system (daemon and utilities) > .... Shorted this a bit. > 2018.05.09-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 all wireless > regulatory database > This looks ok. > > This is from DC5 with my packages. You’ll note that this list > shows "samba-common 2:4.3...

...reside in a common location, so that other network daemons could share this sort of information. One could imagine a blacklist daemon which maintains the IP addresses, last access times, and some measure of how "busy" each IP address is, and provides that information through some sort of interprocess communication to any network daemons which request it. This would also provide, I think, an easier way than log file scraping for adding firewall rules to block an address which was overly problematic. Regards, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Di...

...specified. - Fix #284: dnstap_collector.c: SOCK_NONBLOCK is not available on Mac/Darwin. - Fix unused variable warning in unit test of udb. - Merge #287: Update nsd.conf.5.in. - Fix autoconf 2.69 warnings in configure. - Merge #295: Update e-mail addresses, add ref to support contracts - Fix for interprocess communication to set quit sync command from main process explicitly. - Fix processing of consolidated IXFRs. - Remove on-disk database. - Answer first query for connections accepted just before reload. - Fix: Always instate write handler after reading a query over TCP. - Fix #14: Set timeout to...

...creating said test driver for the *.ll files would be a rote-work task. The problem is when you need to inspect stderr/stdout; the C and C++ standard libraries are pretty much not there, POSIX only works *NIX-side, and Boost generally locks out all but the most compliant or major compiliers for interprocess work. The send-in-the-report feature of the current test framework is also mandatory; until that has an alternate, the DejaGNU framework should be staying. > (consequently, it is reasons like this that I also *HATE* the automake > tools as they create the most convoluted horrible to deal w...

...ystem for compile. I’ve checked versions as you’ve requested. This version list  is from DC4, with your packages. ubuntu at dc4:~$ dpkg -l |egrep  "samba|winbin|?db|tevent|talloc|nss|wrapper" ii  dbus                                  1.12.2-1ubuntu1                   amd64        simple interprocess messaging  system (daemon and utilities) .... Shorted this a bit.  2018.05.09-0ubuntu1~18.04.1       all          wireless  regulatory database This looks ok.  This is from DC5 with my packages. You’ll note that this list  shows "samba-common   2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.12” but  this is...

...t;keepers" [4]. Concurrency is still an open question, because a kernel thread per VM process is actually overkill. A mix of kernel threads and Erlang-style preemptive green threads might be optimal, but this isn't the interesting part of the proposal IMO. There must also be some sort of interprocess communication (IPC), either via copying between heaps, or an "exchange heap". The exchange heap is the approach taken by the Singularity OS [2] where they add "software isolated processes" to the .NET VM and make it an operating system. There are two approaches I currently fore...

Shawn "AutoDMC" Boles wrote: > I've got an idea for a program, and after readig about 1/3 of your > documentation, I think LLVM is what I'm looking for. > > What I'd like now is some help to see if my idea is "sane" and and shed > light and direction that could be provided. > > I want to build a simplified "Virtual Machine"

...at can be remedied in the somewhat harsh but forceful way of killing the offending process and deleting their hard drive image. As for Networking... I was thinking of using something high level, like Jabber. While Jabber was designed for instant messenging... it could easily be used for "interprocess communication." The hypothetical Folding at home client would contact "ProjectManager at foldingathome.org" to get it's data. The processing node's "Jabber ID" would be something like "node at domain/foldingathome". The server could send updates to t...