Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "interpoltry".
2016 May 01
2
Storage of byte code-compiled functions in sysdata.rda
...R-code needs to be given, but also the
preparation steps to produce the packages on the right R version;
so please follow steps (1)--(6) below; I am not 100% sure whether this already gives
you all information needed for this, but if not so please let me know.
(1) create a minimal R-package "InterpolTry"
with byte-compilation on in the DESCRIPTION file
and with stats::approxfun imported in the NAMESPACE file
(2) in an R session on R-devel do
require(InterpolTry)
x <- 1:100
y <- 1:100
fun <- approxfun(x,y)
## revise the next line accordingly to your local settings
S...
2016 May 05
0
Storage of byte code-compiled functions in sysdata.rda
...t also the
> preparation steps to produce the packages on the right R version;
>
> so please follow steps (1)--(6) below; I am not 100% sure whether this already gives
> you all information needed for this, but if not so please let me know.
>
> (1) create a minimal R-package "InterpolTry"
> with byte-compilation on in the DESCRIPTION file
> and with stats::approxfun imported in the NAMESPACE file
>
> (2) in an R session on R-devel do
>
> require(InterpolTry)
> x <- 1:100
> y <- 1:100
> fun <- approxfun(x,y)
> ## revise the next...
2016 May 01
2
Storage of byte code-compiled functions in sysdata.rda
Hi r-devels,
we are seeing a new problem with our packages RobAStRDA (just new on CRAN, thanks
to Uwe and Kurt!) and RobExtremes (to be submitted).
It must be something recent with the way you internally treat/store byte-code compiled
functions, as we have no problems with R-3.1.3, but do see an "Error in fct(x) : byte code
version mismatch" with R-devel SVNrev r70532.
Background: