search for: internecto

Hi Xen developers and enthousiasts, Recently I have been having a lot of problems with HVM hosts on a dual Xeon E5606 box. Problem is that HVM hosts don''t work on it at all and crash the server. Today I got the logging to work over an IPMI console so then I compiled a fresh xen-unstable. Apart from the message I posted in the subject the call trace reads as follows: (XEN) Xen call

Hey, On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Linus van Geuns <linus@vangeuns.name> wrote: > Hey, > > I am currently considering a two machine Xen setup based on AMD Opterons, > more precisely Dell R515s or R415s with dual Opteron 4274HE. > Does anyone has some Xen setup(s) running on top of Opterons 4274HE, Opteron > 4200 or Dell R515 machines and is willing to share some

...rs:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:26883663 (25.6 MiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) [root@virtual2 pvasquez]# Julio Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:01:58 +0200 From: Mark van Dijk <lists+xen@internecto.net> To: xen-users@lists.xen.org Subject: [Xen-users] Xen networking experiment (with custom scripts and OpenVSwitch) Message-ID: <20120729120158.73ab4f91@internecto.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Hello everyone, Recently I have been testing my customized Xen 4.2 networ...

Hello, While using xen 4.1-testing.hg (r23202) I noticed that the ''vifname'' config value is not handled by xl, but is handled by xm. Is there a workaround or patch for this? My firewall and scripts depend on static vifnames. XM works good - it adds multiple interfaces to multiple bridges and configures them appropriately. But with xl it differs -- here only tap devices are

Hello, While using xen 4.1-testing.hg (r23202) I noticed that the ''vifname'' config value is not handled by xl, but is handled by xm. Is there a workaround or patch for this? My firewall and scripts depend on static vifnames. XM works good - it adds multiple interfaces to multiple bridges and configures them appropriately. But with xl it differs -- here only tap devices are

Hi Guys I''m trying to measure the traffic of domUs using vnstat without luck. My configuration: Debian 6.0.3 xen 4.0.1 vnstat 1.11 I''m using bonding with two network cards. auto bond0 iface bond0 inet manual slaves eth0 eth1 bond-mode active-backup bond-miimon 100 bond-updelay 200 bond-downdelay 200 bond-primary eth0 auto br0 iface br0 inet static

Hi. I have an old Xen para virt vm which I created using sparse file. Is there any way to convert this vm image to non-sparse without shutting down the vm?. Thanks Paras.

Dear all, I''m setting up a new gateway for a small network (under 30 users)Gw will host the following services:shorewalldnsproxy i''m considering installing snort.can i do so on the same exact box ? is there any security risk of doing so ? box would have 4 ISPs and two internal interfaces. Any recommendation about the optimal setup of snort and shorewall (or if you suggest

Hi everyone, When I set CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR, CONFIG_CPU_IDLE and CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE to y then I cannot boot Xen; there is a crash. If I turn CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE off then the boot goes well and, after dom0 has booted, xenpm works and gives some sane output, see below. I have tested this with kernels 3.2 to 3.4.6. Is it impossible to use INTEL_IDLE with Xen? If this is a known issue then maybe

Hi everyone, When I set CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR, CONFIG_CPU_IDLE and CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE to y then I cannot boot Xen; there is a crash. If I turn CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE off then the boot goes well and, after dom0 has booted, xenpm works and gives some sane output, see below. I have tested this with kernels 3.2 to 3.4.6. Is it impossible to use INTEL_IDLE with Xen? If this is a known issue then maybe

Hi all, After applying some updates onto a Debian web server, I rebooted it. However it will no longer start, and generates this error in XenCenter: 22/12/2011 09:57:45 Error: Starting VM ''Web Server'' - Using <class ''grub.GrubConf.Grub2ConfigFile''>; to parse /boot/grub/grub.cfg - WARNING:root:Unknown directive load_video - WARNING:root:Unknown directive

Hi everyone, I just got this issue where pv-grub would not become visible after I did ''xl create -c host''. Turned out that Xen on Archlinux, for which I use a modified PKGBUILD, does not create /var/run/xen. So if you have this problem too then just let the xencommons rc script create that directory after each boot. At least it solved this problem. Sometimes things can be so

The number of distributions that are dropping grub 1 support is raising. Tody I received a notification from Arch Linux who are also doing this. The problem with this situation is when a distro installs grub2 because of a package dependency. So what I would like to know is whether there are more alternatives for PV than pvgrub. ExtLinux or pvgrub2 would be nice.. Mark

Hello everyone, I''ve always wondered - would dom0 be better off with a tickless kernel or not? In other words, can someone explain which choice to make with regards to CONFIG_NO_HZ? -- Stay in touch, Mark van Dijk. ,-------------------------------- ----------------------------'' Mon Aug 06 15:40 UTC 2012 Today is Pungenday, the 72nd day of Confusion in the

Short question: is it possible to share entropy across all VMs and how can this be done? I found http://vanheusden.com/entropybroker/ which seems to offer a way, but I cannot get it to work, syslog tells me "stack smashing detected". So if there are ways people are currently using I''d be interested to hear them. Currently I find that even generating a gpg key on a PV VM takes

Hi, I just tested booting Windows 2008 server 64 bit using GPLPV drivers. It seems to work with qemu traditional, but with Qemu upstream (1.1-stable) there is a BSOD when using the most recent signed GPLPV drivers (paging fault in non-paged area). -- Stay in touch, Mark van Dijk. ,--------------------------------- -----------------------------'' Sat Sep 08 08:14

When trying to start a FreeBSD 9.0 HVM guest I see the following line in qemu-dm-freebsd.log: qemu-dm: /src/xen-stable-hg/src/xen-4.1-testing.hg-build/tools/ioemu-dir/hw/eepro100.c:1320: eepro100_write4: Assertion `!"feature is missing in this emulation: " "unknown longword write"'' failed. The domain crashes. I suspect this occurs because I am trying to build the

Hi, I realise that one can simply start fail2ban and then it will insert its own ruleset before shorewall''s ruleset. Are there subscribers to this list having alternative (and probably better) ways to use both fail2ban and shorewall? Thanks, Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90

Hello everyone, Recently I have been testing my customized Xen 4.2 networking setup. It works pretty good and I would like to share it with anyone who is interested. The relevant files can be found here: https://github.com/slacks42/xenscripts Benefit: configure the Xen related networking devices with one understandable bash script. Please note that this is all still work in progress. For