search for: internalunsupportedscarybad

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "internalunsupportedscarybad".

2014 Aug 26
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Removing static initializers for command line options
...ons. This would mean the C++ API for setting this in LLVMContext (and the C API if we ever expose it there) would only support setting these in asserts builds. We could even sink the checking into the registry. The name should probably have "debug" in it somewhere. It would then have some InternalUnsupportedScaryBad API which is not actually in the header files but is used in LLVM's tools to maintain their current behavior without documenting a public API. It's not bulletproof, but it seemed that it would be sufficient for the debugging use cases and is a strong statement of "unsupported" IMO...
2014 Aug 19
45
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Removing static initializers for command line options
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:32 PM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> * Nobs for which there is not a single right answer for all users. >>> There are very few of these currently and we expect it to remain like >>> that. These should not use cl::opt or static storage at all. They >>> should be an option passed to the