search for: internalised

...re? Tail >> pages don't have individual refcounts; all the refcounts are actually I had stuck with using the page because none of this stuff (yet) supports compound pages anyway so we shouldn't see a tail page anyway. But point taken, I admit I need to find some time to get a deeper internalised understanding of folios than just s/page/folio. > ohh, and I really should have caught that too. I plead spending too much > time recently in a somewhat more driver-centric mindset, and failing to > mentally shift gears properly for this case. > > Sorry for missing that! > > t...

Has anyone used Puppet to manage Solaris Patches? If so could you pass on any tips. For those without Solaris experience, you can only describe the configuration of a Solaris system with the full combination of Installed Packages Installed Patches Applied Configuration

Hi , Given the following LLVM IR : define i32 @foo(i32 %l) #0 { entry: %add = add nsw i32 %l, 3 ret i32 %add } ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable define i32 @boo(i32 %k) #0 { entry: %call = call i32 @foo(i32 %k) ret i32 %call } ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable define i32 @main() #0 { entry: %add = add nsw i32 1, 2 %add2 = add nsw i32 2, %add ret i32 %add2 } I want to be able

> Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 18:55:13 +0100 > From: "A. Ilchinger via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: [llvm-dev] intra vs inter module LTO > Message-ID: <0MdFwl-1gvHrS3utf-00ISyE at mail.gmx.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > I'd like to know if LTO also works in the

If you want to know which functions are (or may be) called from where, in the entire program, then you will need to do some sort of "LLVM-IR Linking" (there are tools that will do that for you, such as "llvm-link"). Of course, even then, there's possible cases where it's impossible to know whether a function is ACTUALLY called until at runtime - function pointers,

On 3/28/23 20:16, Matthew Wilcox wrote: ... >> + if (!get_page_unless_zero(vmf->page)) >> + return 0; > > From a folio point of view: what the hell are you doing here? Tail > pages don't have individual refcounts; all the refcounts are actually ohh, and I really should have caught that too. I plead spending too much time recently in a somewhat more driver-centric

Thank You David and Mats for the reply, The reason I need to know that main is the entry point is as follows : I have a dead code elimination pass that removes the function call for boo. boo was initially called from the main function , but since the return in the main function has no dependency on boo, boo function call is removed. Now I want to remove the function definition of the functions

> I’m just wondering why not have a ‘br’ to an exit basic block instead of ‘ret’ mid-stream of instructions. > Have you considered this approach instead? Thanks for bringing this up. Yes. In fact, I tried that approach/pattern first. Simply, you create default exit block and a local return variable (to track return value) per function, but it requires extra flags and variables to track

Hi everyone, I thought long and hard (ok, not *that* long) about whether or not to crosspost this to icecast-dev. In the end I decided not to since this isn't about an Icecast or Xiph project. My name is Geoff Shang and I've been an enthusiastic user of Icecast for a long time. I am also the chief tech guy for a project called ACB Radio (http://www.acbradio.org), which is run by

TEST 3 If you get a "connection refused" response then the smbd server may not be running. If you installed it in inetd.conf then you probably edited that file incorrectly. If you installed it as a daemon then check that it is running, and check that the netbios-ssn port is in a LISTEN state using "netstat -a". Note: You have xinetd not inetd on the redhat box. To avoid all