Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "internal_usernam".
Did you mean:
internal_username
2004 Mar 02
0
Re: winbind and unix/nt login match use unix uid - resolved
...I get the following
> message.
> [2004/02/27 09:24:43, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305)
> check_ntlm_password: authentication for user
> [Lex] -> [aludeman] -> [DOMAIN+aludeman] succeeded
>
> in the source code is:
> user_info->smb_name.str, user_info->internal_username.str, unix_username
>
> So the behavior that I'm seeing is that it's always taking the NT
> domain precedence over the local passwd. When DOMAIN+aludeman does
> not exist then things behave like I would like them where HOMEGAIN+Lex
> maps to unix user aludeman uid.
>
&g...
2004 Feb 26
2
winbind and unix/nt login match use unix uid
Hi,
I'm on solaris 9, and using winbind to be a part of our NT domain.
I'm trying to determine if it's possible to configure winbind/smb so
that when the nt login name matches the unix login name the share is
mounted using their unix uid. With none matching account names,
username map works fine. It doesn't appear that "johnsmith =
johnsmith" works in the username map
2005 Sep 30
3
Differences with net join
All;
I'm getting closer to tracking down my problem (I hope).
Since I want samba to verify the windows users from the Windows
domain, I did the usual net join. But it still doesn't get the users
from there, I still need an smbpasswd file.
So... now the question (for the real samba gurus):
Is there a substantial difference between:
net ads join -w <domain/workgroup>
and
net rpc