search for: internal_test_rint64

...eq_fail(f, v) { - print(f + " returned unexpected value: " + v); - fail = true; -} - -var g = new Guestfs.Session(); - -var v; -var eq; - -v = g.internal_test_rint('1'); -v == 1 || eq_fail('internal_test_rint', v); -check_error('internal_test_rinterr'); - -v = g.internal_test_rint64('1'); -v == 1 || eq_fail('internal_test_rint64', v); -check_error('internal_test_rint64err'); - -v = g.internal_test_rbool('true'); -v == 1 || eq_fail('internal_test_rbool', v); -check_error('internal_test_rboolerr'); - -v = g.internal_test_rconststri...

...-19,6 +19,7 @@ import unittest import guestfs +from .tests_helper import * class Test090PythonRetValues (unittest.TestCase): @@ -33,7 +34,7 @@ class Test090PythonRetValues (unittest.TestCase): def test_rint64 (self): g = guestfs.GuestFS () - self.assertAlmostEqual (g.internal_test_rint64 ("10"), 10L, places=1) + self.assertAlmostEqual (g.internal_test_rint64 ("10"), int_type (10), places=1) self.assertRaises (RuntimeError, g.internal_test_rint64err) -- 2.5.0

...(self): - g = guestfs.GuestFS () - - self.assertAlmostEqual (g.internal_test_rint ("10"), 10, places=1) - - self.assertRaises (RuntimeError, g.internal_test_rinterr) - - - def test_rint64 (self): - g = guestfs.GuestFS () - - self.assertAlmostEqual (g.internal_test_rint64 ("10"), 10L, places=1) - - self.assertRaises (RuntimeError, g.internal_test_rint64err) - - - def test_rbool (self): - g = guestfs.GuestFS () - - self.assertTrue (g.internal_test_rbool ("true")) - self.assertFalse (g.internal_test_rbool ("false...

Hi, this series cleans up the Python sources, either static or generated, including also tests, to make them PEP 8 compliant; see https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ and tools like pep8. Almost all the issues reported by pep8 are fixed, reducing the issues from 3818 to 7. The changes should have no effect on the actual code, while it will help Python users with consistency with other

...{ + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rinterr().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rint64() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint64("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rint64err().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rbool() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert!(g.internal_test_rbool("true").unwrap()); + assert!(!g.internal_test_rbool("false").unw...

...{ + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rinterr().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rint64() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint64("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rint64err().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rbool() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert!(g.internal_test_rbool("true").unwrap()); + assert!(!g.internal_test_rbool("false").unw...

....expect("create"); > + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint("10").unwrap(), 10); > + assert!(g.internal_test_rinterr().is_err()) > +} > + > +#[test] > +fn rint64() { > + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); > + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint64("10").unwrap(), 10); > + assert!(g.internal_test_rint64err().is_err()) > +} > + > +#[test] > +fn rbool() { > + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); > + assert!(g.internal_test_rbool("true").unwrap()); > + assert!(!g.in...

...{ + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rinterr().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rint64() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint64("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rint64err().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rbool() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert!(g.internal_test_rbool("true").unwrap()); + assert!(!g.internal_test_rbool("false").unw...

> Is this just trying if the guestfs can be linked with? Yes. In OCaml bindings, there is the corresponding test( https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/ocaml/t/guestfs_010_load.ml). I just mimicked it. If it is not required, I will remove it. divided the generated files and handmade files in rust/src/ directory. I'll send this fixed patch to this mailing list. I'm not

On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:04:57AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:49:55AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:10:10AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: >> >On Saturday, 6 July 2019 13:03:24 CEST Martin Kletzander wrote: >> >>Just one thing, the Cargo.toml includes a version under which the crate would be >>

...{ + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rinterr().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rint64() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint64("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rint64err().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rbool() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert!(g.internal_test_rbool("true").unwrap()); + assert!(!g.internal_test_rbool("false").unw...

...{ + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rinterr().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rint64() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert_eq!(g.internal_test_rint64("10").unwrap(), 10); + assert!(g.internal_test_rint64err().is_err()) +} + +#[test] +fn rbool() { + let g = guestfs::Handle::create().expect("create"); + assert!(g.internal_test_rbool("true").unwrap()); + assert!(!g.internal_test_rbool("false").unw...

Hi Hiroyuki, sorry for the late reply. Most of the work is definitely nice! There are few notes below, although they are not big issues. I will check this patch once more on monday, especially the rust parts. Otherwise, I'd say that we are close to merging this :) On Tuesday, 23 July 2019 10:37:17 CEST Hiroyuki Katsura wrote: > From: Hiroyuki_Katsura

I fixed the patch I submitted before based on comments, and there are some commits which are merged or divided. So, I will re-send all the patches. Regards, Hiroyuki Katsura

From: Hiroyuki_Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com> --- Makefile.am | 4 ++++ configure.ac | 3 +++ generator/Makefile.am | 3 +++ generator/bindtests.ml | 3 +++ generator/bindtests.mli | 1 + generator/main.ml | 5 +++++ generator/rust.ml | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/rust.mli | 19 +++++++++++++++++++

Split up the huge generator/actions.ml into several smaller files. Rich.