search for: intermixing

LLVMers, I have a traversal plan which needs to visit certain types of Functions. For each instruction in such functions, I will need to know: 1. is it located inside a loop 2. if yes, what level of loop nest it is currently in. So on the highest level, it should be a FunctionPass. However, in order to identify loops and loop-nest levels, it should also be a LoopPass. Is there a reasonably

On Jan 6, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Chuck Zhao wrote: > LLVMers, > > I have a traversal plan which needs to visit certain types of Functions. For each instruction in such functions, I will need to know: > 1. is it located inside a loop > 2. if yes, what level of loop nest it is currently in. > > So on the highest level, it should be a FunctionPass. However, in order to identify

Hello! I have encountered a really weird problem. Maybe you've encountered it before? I have a large data frame "importances". It has one factor ($A) with 3 levels: 3, 9, and 15. $B is a regular numeric variable. Below I am picking a really small sub-frame (just 3 rows) based on "indices". "indices" were chosen so that all 3 levels of A are present:

while "security =3D ads" fail ,revert "security =3D user" example : AD Account ad_test Local Account user_test while request username =3D user_test, can login ad_test can login too How to do it ???From dave at dcdata.co.za Fri Mar 4 07:48:58 2005 From: dave at dcdata.co.za (David Wilson) Date: Fri Mar 4 07:49:34 2005 Subject: [Samba] Re: Logon Hours

I received this response from a member of the OpenLDAP core team when asking about meaning of the deferred operations I was seeing. Is it possible that this is what I'm seeing, Timo? -Ben --------------------------------------------- I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on the same connection in an asynchronous manner, then the server behavior as per RFC4511 is

Hey, we are intermixing LLVM IR generated from C code with IR generated from our custom RenderMan frontend. I am not sure whether this is relevant for you, but in our restricted setting (the C code does not change frequently and we have full control at link time) this works flawless. Best, Ralf Am 05.03.2011 11:42, s...

Hi all We migrated our IMAP server from Courier to Dovecot. The minor problem appeared: Dovecot LIST command now shows mailbox listing in some weird order. (I suppose, it is filesystem directory order) Previously, with Courier, it was sorted, i.e., the INBOX was the first, followed by other system folders. This is not a problem with our webmail, because it sorts folders by its own. But with some

On 1/19/2013 1:55 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > -ffast-math is *totally* different from these attributes, and in fact > -ffast-math is specifically not modeled as a function attribute because > it changes the fundamental semantics of an operation. It's not different at all. The user may want to compile parts of the program with -ffast-math, and parts without it. Same thing

On Jan 19, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 1/19/2013 1:55 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> >> -ffast-math is *totally* different from these attributes, and in fact >> -ffast-math is specifically not modeled as a function attribute because >> it changes the fundamental semantics of an operation. > > It's not

...and run it. I am wondering how I would set up the bridge device if I run both at the same time. Would I be able to set up another bridge device (br1) encompassing the same physical eth0 port and a new tap1 virtual device. It doesn't feel right... And even if I could, I wonder if there would be intermixing of vpn traffic appearing on the two tap ports. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150313/73594160/attachment.html>

Hi all, Is it possible to merge two different languages in the same IR? With Java, JNI specifies a whole lot of rules to make C structures and PCS work with Java classes, if we were to do the same thing in IR, would that work? Is there anyone doing this today (with any language)? -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at

On 11/08/2011 11:29 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 20:24 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 11/08/2011 03:36 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:12 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>> On 11/08/2011 11:45 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: [A lot of performance results skipped] OK. As expected part of the speedup is because of unrolling, however it

On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 20:24 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 11/08/2011 03:36 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:12 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >> On 11/08/2011 11:45 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> I've attached the latest version of my autovectorization patch. > >>> > >>> Working through the test suite has proved to be a

hello: I have 3 data.frame objects. First df object: Of dim (149,31). Columns 2:31 are marked as T1..T14 and N1..N16. Name T1 T2 N1 T3 N2 N3 N4 T4 mu1 10 10 9 10 9 9 8 10 mu2 11 11 9 11 9 9 9 11 ... muN 12 12 9 11 9 9 8 12 Second df object: of Dim (50000,31). Columns 2:31 are maked as T1...T14 and N1..N16.

...function. For many practical application this is unacceptable. The reason, as you're likely aware, that the constrained FP operations must be used within the entire function is that, if you mix the constrained FP operations with the normal ones, there's no way to prevent code motion from intermixing them. The solution I recall being discussed to this problem of a function which requires constrained operations only in part is outlining in Clang - this does introduce function-call overhead (although perhaps some MI-level inlining pass could mitigate that in part), but otherwise permits normal op...

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 12:42 -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Le jeudi 13 janvier 2005 ? 10:59 -0500, Jared Whitby a ?crit : > > Interestingly enough.. I started playing around with preprocessing > > options in 1.1.6 and happened upon the denoise filter > > (SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE). When i run the test tone using that > > option it is completely filtered out and I

Sorry, I realized I hadn't replied to this. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 1/14/2013 4:57 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> >> I absolutely think that when a function has an optimization attribute, >> that applies to the code in the function and all code inlined into the >> function. If foo

We're considering implementing gluster for a genomics cluster, and it seems to have some theoretical advantages that so far seem to have been borne out in some limited testing, mod some odd problems with an inability to delete dir trees. I'm about to test with the latest beta that was promised to clear up these bugs, but as I'm doing that, answers to these Qs would be

On Jan 3, 2014, at 2:19 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> While having different components of LLVM and consumers of LLVM able to intermix NDEBUG and !NDEBUG built code freely without ABI issues is nice-to-have in my book, the functionality provided by AssertingVH is significantly more nice-to-have, and I don't see any easy ways to contain or limit the

Hi folks, I'm finally tired of dealing with floppy disks to control our remote installs and thought that PXELINUX sound like a great way to go. However, I've got multiple hurdles and I'd like some advice before I get myself dug in too deep... We currently have Solaris Jumpstart and Windows RIS running in the department and now we would like to intermix Linux PXELINUX booting. Any