search for: intermixed

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 149 matches for "intermixed".

2011 Jan 06
2
[LLVMdev] Identify Loops from within FunctionPass, or possible to intermix different types of Passes?
LLVMers, I have a traversal plan which needs to visit certain types of Functions. For each instruction in such functions, I will need to know: 1. is it located inside a loop 2. if yes, what level of loop nest it is currently in. So on the highest level, it should be a FunctionPass. However, in order to identify loops and loop-nest levels, it should also be a LoopPass. Is there a reasonably
2011 Jan 06
0
[LLVMdev] Identify Loops from within FunctionPass, or possible to intermix different types of Passes?
On Jan 6, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Chuck Zhao wrote: > LLVMers, > > I have a traversal plan which needs to visit certain types of Functions. For each instruction in such functions, I will need to know: > 1. is it located inside a loop > 2. if yes, what level of loop nest it is currently in. > > So on the highest level, it should be a FunctionPass. However, in order to identify
2007 Apr 12
3
Comment from OpenLDAP developer regarding "deferring operations"
...seeing, Timo? -Ben --------------------------------------------- I'd note that if your client is performing search + bind on the same connection in an asynchronous manner, then the server behavior as per RFC4511 is undefined, since a server is not supposed to be willing to handle operations intermixed with binds until a bind is concluded. That is, any operation can be multiplexed on a single LDAP connection __except__ binds, which must be serialized. A more appropriate client for that type of operations would need to use at least 2 connections, one for searches and one for binds, and the one f...
2013 Feb 28
5
IMAP folders sort order
...ting in some weird order. (I suppose, it is filesystem directory order) Previously, with Courier, it was sorted, i.e., the INBOX was the first, followed by other system folders. This is not a problem with our webmail, because it sorts folders by its own. But with some IMAP clients, we have folders intermixed. Is there a way to influence the folder sort order in Dovecot? WBR, valery
2011 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] Two languages in the same IR
Hey, we are intermixing LLVM IR generated from C code with IR generated from our custom RenderMan frontend. I am not sure whether this is relevant for you, but in our restricted setting (the C code does not change frequently and we have full control at link time) this works flawless. Best, Ralf Am 05.03.2011 11:42, schrieb Renato Golin: > Hi all, > > Is it possible to merge two
2013 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
On 1/19/2013 1:55 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > -ffast-math is *totally* different from these attributes, and in fact > -ffast-math is specifically not modeled as a function attribute because > it changes the fundamental semantics of an operation. It's not different at all. The user may want to compile parts of the program with -ffast-math, and parts without it. Same
2013 Jan 21
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
...asses, but provide (relaxed) semantics for the optimizations themselves to obey. The optimizations, inlining, etc. happen at the LLVM IR level (below clang), so I'll talk about the IR level now. At the IR level, fast-math flags are per-instruction semantic flags and flagged instructions can be intermixed with non-fast-math flagged instructions. Dropping the flags is conservative, so at the worst case they will be dropped, but they will usually be kept and will always be optimized correctly and safely when intermixed. Clang currently only has a global mode with -ffast-math, but there's nothing...
2011 Nov 10
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On 11/08/2011 11:29 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 20:24 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >> On 11/08/2011 03:36 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:12 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: >>>> On 11/08/2011 11:45 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: [A lot of performance results skipped] OK. As expected part of the speedup is because of
2015 Mar 13
2
Some basic questions
I'm currently running Openvpn on a multi-homed linux server. The bridge device br0 comprises the tap0 virtual device and the physical eth0 device. Eth0 is wired to the local LAN. Remote clients dial into the server's external interface eth1's udp port 1194. This works but when the number of clients increases (over 12), we see lots of dropped packets and lost connections. We look at
2011 Mar 05
4
[LLVMdev] Two languages in the same IR
Hi all, Is it possible to merge two different languages in the same IR? With Java, JNI specifies a whole lot of rules to make C structures and PCS work with Java classes, if we were to do the same thing in IR, would that work? Is there anyone doing this today (with any language)? -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at
2011 Nov 08
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 20:24 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 11/08/2011 03:36 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:12 +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote: > >> On 11/08/2011 11:45 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> I've attached the latest version of my autovectorization patch. > >>> > >>> Working through the test suite has
2019 Oct 03
2
[RFC] Using basic block attributes to implement non-default floating point environment
On 10/2/19 5:12 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: On 10/1/19 12:35 AM, Serge Pavlov via llvm-dev wrote: Hi all, This proposal is aimed at support of floating point environment, in which some properties like rounding mode or exception behavior differ from those used by default. This include in particular support of 'pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS', 'pragma STDC FENV_ROUND' as well as
2011 Oct 26
4
Some questions about theoretical gluster failures.
We''re considering implementing gluster for a genomics cluster, and it seems to have some theoretical advantages that so far seem to have been borne out in some limited testing, mod some odd problems with an inability to delete dir trees. I''m about to test with the latest beta that was promised to clear up these bugs, but as I''m doing that, answers to these Qs would
2013 Jan 19
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Codifying (but not formalizing) the optimization levels in LLVM and Clang
Sorry, I realized I hadn't replied to this. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 1/14/2013 4:57 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> >> I absolutely think that when a function has an optimization attribute, >> that applies to the code in the function and all code inlined into the >> function. If
2014 Jan 04
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Goal for 3.5: Library-friendly headers
On Jan 3, 2014, at 2:19 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> While having different components of LLVM and consumers of LLVM able to intermix NDEBUG and !NDEBUG built code freely without ABI issues is nice-to-have in my book, the functionality provided by AssertingVH is significantly more nice-to-have, and I don't see any easy ways to contain or limit the
2002 Mar 15
3
RIS and PXELINUX
Hi folks, I'm finally tired of dealing with floppy disks to control our remote installs and thought that PXELINUX sound like a great way to go. However, I've got multiple hurdles and I'd like some advice before I get myself dug in too deep... We currently have Solaris Jumpstart and Windows RIS running in the department and now we would like to intermix Linux PXELINUX booting. Any
2015 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Question about load clustering in the machine scheduler
Hi, I have a program with over 100 loads (each with a 10 cycle latency) at the beginning of the program, and I can't figure out how to get the machine scheduler to intermix ALU instructions with the loads to effectively hide the latency. It seems the issue is with load clustering. I restrict load clustering to 4 at a time, but when I look at the debug output, the loads are always being
2014 Jan 03
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Goal for 3.5: Library-friendly headers
On Jan 3, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > > The key thing then is to make sure that it's safe to enable the > > assertions in the headers if an application is built with !NDEBUG and > > linked against an NDEBUG version of LLVM. > > Sounds great. I'm pretty confident that there will be no problems - in practice
2010 Nov 07
1
[LLVMdev] Using MC Parser data
Hi, llvmdev! I have some thoughts about using the LLVM MC Parser's data to extract information about symbols like global data and 'functions' (labels with code following) intermixed with preprocessor directives (for example a C-like include file using function-like macros defined in the assembler source code). I'm looking at the MCContext class which is likely to own all symbols in the file and all sections. However, I do not see whether the MC parser gathers any data abo...
2016 Feb 19
2
Maildir++ and fs-layout
Dear All, can I use Maildir++ Layout for private namespace and fs-layout for public namespace on the same server, provided that the hierarchy separator is the same (.)? Are all parts of dovecot (especially deliver, sieve and lmtp) compatible with fs-layout? Are there any restrictions I have to obey? - Chris