search for: interlocking

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit d2434e4d942c32cadcbdbcd32c58f35098f3b604 ] Cursor position updates were accidentally causing us to attempt to interlock window with window immediate, and without a matching window immediate update, NVDisplay could hang forever in some circumstances. Fixes suspend/resume on (at least) Quadro RTX4000 (TU104). Reported-by: Lyude

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit d2434e4d942c32cadcbdbcd32c58f35098f3b604 ] Cursor position updates were accidentally causing us to attempt to interlock window with window immediate, and without a matching window immediate update, NVDisplay could hang forever in some circumstances. Fixes suspend/resume on (at least) Quadro RTX4000 (TU104). Reported-by: Lyude

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit d2434e4d942c32cadcbdbcd32c58f35098f3b604 ] Cursor position updates were accidentally causing us to attempt to interlock window with window immediate, and without a matching window immediate update, NVDisplay could hang forever in some circumstances. Fixes suspend/resume on (at least) Quadro RTX4000 (TU104). Reported-by: Lyude

i install the wine 1.1.25 but after awhile installation stops and heres some detail in terminal > configure: libcapi20 development files not found, ISDN won't be supported. > configure: libldap (OpenLDAP) development files not found, LDAP won't be supported. > > configure: Finished. Do 'make depend && make' to compile Wine. > > cc -c -I. -I.

I think I've read somewhere about panic during early root mount, fsck etc.. Perhaps this might be related: Full dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/misc/dmesg.boot.amd64 [....] acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "vnode interlock" 1st vnode interlock @ kern/vfs_vnops.c:791 2nd vnode interlock @ kern/vfs_subr.c:2018 KDB: stack backtrace: witness_checkorder() at

Hi. I've decided to do a regression test in order to find out what's wrong with Dreamfall (see AppDB), and that involves comparing releases 0.9.61 and 1.1.12 (reports have been "garbage" ever since 1.0.0, but with errors different from mine). However, when building for the first time, this error occurs: Code: ccache gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__

I have wrote a small Linux Shell command for implementing Interlock Protocol which is known as a cryptographic protocol that resistant to man-in-the-middle attack. Here is the steps of interlock protocol: *(1)* Alice send her public key to Bob *(2)* Bob send his public key to Alice. *(3)* Alice encrypts her message using Bob's public key. Then she sends half of that encrypted message to

Hi, I'm working on a custom top-down post RA scheduler which builds bundles at the same time for our VLIW processor. I've borrowed most of the implementation from the resource priority queue implemented for the existent VLIW scheduler but applied to the context of MI scheduling. Basically, instructions that are likely to be bundled must be scheduled first (i.e. get higher priority).

On Apr 20, 2012, at 10:31 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > I'd like to begin a project to rework the scheduler to address some > problems we've discovered on this end. The goal is to get a more > configurable/flexible scheduler while simplifying maintenance by > separating policy from implementation to get independent and > interchangeable parts. > > This is going to be

Author: bonwick Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 41acc27e604047650771dceb4535b8586bd34848 Log message: 6344108 snapshot create/delete interlock with scrub/resilver must sync txg Files: update: usr/src/cmd/ztest/ztest.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa.c

Hi all, I am trying to compile Wine 0.9.32 from source on an AMD64 desktop running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4. I configure as follows: % ./configure --prefix=/home/mfuhrer/sw/linux --with-x --enable-wine64 This works fine. I run make depend, followed by make, and get the following error: % make make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/io/home/mfuhrer/sw/src/wine-0.9.32/tools' make[1]:

Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> writes: > We plan to move to the MachineScheduler by 3.2. The structure is: How hard will this be to backport to 3.1? Has woprk on this started yet? > ScheduleDAG: Abstract DAG of SUnits and SDeps > | > v > ScheduleDAGInstrs: Build the DAG from MachineInstrs, each SUnit tied to an MI > Delimit the current

While I had thought I'd tested this before, it looks like this one issue slipped by my original CRC patches. Basically, there seem to be a few rules we need to follow when sending CRC commands to the display controller: * CRCs cannot be both disabled and enabled for a single head in the same flush * If a head with CRC reporting enabled switches from one OR to another, there must be a

Hi all, Thanks for your feed-backs :-) @Andrew: In fact, I've reused most of the postRA list scheduler code and the resource priority queue. Every time it needs to move forward, either because of a res hazard (HazardRec) or an invalid combination of instructions in the current packet (DFA), it closes the current bundle and advances to the next cycle. The non-interlocked nature of our

On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:37 AM, Ivan Llopard <ivanllopard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on a custom top-down post RA scheduler which builds bundles > at the same time for our VLIW processor. I've borrowed most of the > implementation from the resource priority queue implemented for the > existent VLIW scheduler but applied to the context of MI

Hey Everyone, I'd like to begin a project to rework the scheduler to address some problems we've discovered on this end. The goal is to get a more configurable/flexible scheduler while simplifying maintenance by separating policy from implementation to get independent and interchangeable parts. This is going to be challenging because we are still stuck on LLVM 2.9. We will be upgrading

Hi, I am working on developing a professional Marketing Materials for my systems. I plan on using a very good(expensive) company to do that so splitting the costs with several people would be nice. Let me know if you are interested on taking part in it. robert -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Martin, > The CPU that I am targeting is VLIW with no hardware interlocking (the next instruction does not wait for the previous to complete). This leads to fairly complex scheduling, but can be generally accommodated well in LLVM. Thanks for sharing your usecase about instruction scheduling, I am learning Instruction Selector by reading ARM and AMDGPU target's s...

This adds support on GF119:GV100 (exclusive) for CTM (aka CSC). Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- v1 -> v2: - ctm -> csc - mark csc.valid = false when there is no ctm property drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/atom.h | 6 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/base907c.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 16 +++++

On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: > > Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this > (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc > appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver > init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd