search for: intergation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 75 matches for "intergation".

Did you mean: integration
2005 Sep 05
3
numerical intergation
how does one numerically intergate the following: A=function(x,y) { xy } over the range: 2<x<0 4<y<10 say. ie how would one set up the integrate function? i forgot!
2009 Jul 18
2
Zinb for Non-interger data
Sorry bit of a Newbie question, and I promise I have searched the forum already, but I'm getting a bit desperate! I have over-dispersed, zero inflated data, with variance greater than the mean, suggesting Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial - which I attempted in R with the pscl package suggested on http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/R/dae/zinbreg.htm However my data is non-integer with some pesky
2006 Nov 17
1
How to intergate openldap in to sendmail - cent os 4.4
Hi All I want to intergrate openldap in to sendmail. How can I do it? I think I will have to write a few things in to sendmail.mc. The purpose of this is that I do not need system accounts anymore. But instead I nead Openldap users. How can I achieve this goal? Pls help me. -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2006 Jun 19
1
how to do this sum?
Hi, Everybody! I have a big table which named table_x, and all the elements in the table is very large! Now I want to do the summay on the talbe_x[,3]. Unfornately, I can't get the right result! And the R give the warning messages as follow: > sum(table_x[,3]) >[1] NA >Warning message: >interger overflow in sum(.);please use sum(as.numeric(.)) (the original upper message is
2005 Mar 04
0
* intergation with Panasonic D500 and strange echo
Hi, all ! I have a situation like this: [SIP Terminals] <-> [*] < -ISDN-PRI-> [Panasonic D500] <-> Telecom (conn to Telecom is with second PRI card in Panasonic and 16 POTS lines). Panasonic has 2 ISDN PRI cards (one to Telco, and second to Asterisk), 16 POTS lines to telco and 32 (advanced hybrid telephone type) extensions. Idea is to have possibility to have some users on
2006 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] EH and C++ intergation
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: > I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to > make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: > 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the > first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would > abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emittion. Sure.
2006 Nov 21
1
[LLVMdev] EH and C++ intergation
Chris Lattner pravi: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >>> Sure. Anton can give you ideas for this. >>> >> I think it should not be too difficult because you allow custom call >> conversions and this is quite easy to add, we only have to garantee that >> the backend will emit it. > > Right. > >>>> 2) the ret
2006 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] EH and C++ intergation
I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emition. 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has already
2006 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] EH and C++ intergation
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >> Sure. Anton can give you ideas for this. >> > I think it should not be too difficult because you allow custom call > conversions and this is quite easy to add, we only have to garantee that > the backend will emit it. Right. >>> 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has >>>
2006 Apr 26
3
A question about is.interger function
Hi, All I am using is.integer function to examine whether an object is an integer or not, but I get such results, > x<-3 > is.integer(x) [1] FALSE > x<-3:4 > x [1] 3 4 > is.integer(x) [1] TRUE Seems that the is.integer cannot handle scalers, > is.integer(5) [1] FALSE > is.integer(5:6) [1] TRUE Is this a bug in R or I made some mistakes? I am using R 2.2.1 under
2006 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] EH and C++ intergation
I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emittion. 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has already
2006 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] EH and C++ intergation
Chris Lattner pravi: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >> I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided >> how to >> make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: >> 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the >> first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would >>
2002 May 29
4
Why is.integer() doesn't work with single values?
Hi all, I don't understand the behavior of is.integer(): > x <- integer() > is.integer(x) [1] TRUE > x <- 10 > is.integer(x) [1] FALSE > x <- 1:10 > is.integer(x) [1] TRUE Why is.interger() returns FALSE if x has only one element? And how can someone check if x is an integer but contains only one value? (R 1.5.0 on Linux i386) Thanks, Sven
2006 Dec 05
5
if(){} else{}
Dear R-community, my data set looks like 'mat' below. Plant<-c(NA,1,1,1,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,1); Value1<-rnorm(1:10); Value2<-rnorm(1:10); mat<-cbind(Plant,Value1,Value2); I receive data from two different sites. One site is identified by an interger number, the other site has no data in column Plant=NA. My pb: I'm trying to assign labels "A" or "B" to
2012 May 15
2
max value
Here is an R problem I am struggling with: My dataset is organized like this... subject session variable_x variable_y 01 1 1 <interger values> 01 1 2 01 1 3 01 2 1 01 2 2 01
2012 Oct 20
2
Help with programming a tricky algorithm
Hi All, I'm a little stumped by the following problem. I've got a dataset with the following structure: idxy ix iy country (other variables) 1 1 1 c1 x1 2 1 2 c1 x2 3 1 3 c1 x3 . . . . . 3739 55 67 c7 x3739 3740 55 68 c7 x3740 where ix and
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] (no subject)
>> In other words, abandoning overflow detection makes the >> duplication of types redundant, while requiring it would be a >> great burden on CPUs that don't have overflow exception hardware. > >Yes, you're right. This has been a desired change for quite some time >now. Unfortunately, its a huge impact to nearly every part of LLVM. We >will
2009 May 06
4
[LLVMdev] Suggestion: Support union types in IR
Chris Lattner wrote: > On May 5, 2009, at 8:09 PM, Talin wrote: > > >> I wanted to mention, by the way, that my need/desire for this hasn't >> gone away :) >> >> And my wish list still includes support for something like uintptr_t >> - a >> primitive integer type that is defined to always be the same size as a >> pointer, however large or
2007 Oct 10
1
silhouette: clustering labels have to be consecutive intergers starting from 1?
Hi list, When I was using 'silhouette' from the 'cluster' package to calculate clustering performances, R crashed. I traced the problem to the fact that my clustering labels only have 2's and 3's. when I replaced them with 1's and 2's, the problem was solved. Is the function purposely written in this way so when I have clustering labels, "2" and
2006 Jan 21
1
HELP: NoMethodError (undefined method `stringify_keys!'' for
We have a flash developer who is intergating with a rails application when he posts a particular variable (in this case ''rating'') We get a ''Rails Application Error'' Trawling the production log turns up this error; NoMethodError (undefined method `stringify_keys!'' for "10":String): The html wireframe has no such problem. A select box is