search for: intergartion

...t; "null mode" (which nobody ever uses I guess!). > > I'm not sure, but I guess it may be used in VBR or DTX mode? > At least that's why I kept it. Of course it *can* be used (and needs fixing). It just seems few people did :-) > So, what's the next step towards intergartion? I guess it should > be somehow made available from Speex API level, e.g. with > new speex_decoder_ctl() or speex_lib_ctl() request? I have > no idea about the best way here, and would appreciate your > advices. I don't think it should be a _ctl() call because there's too much...

Alexander Chemeris wrote: > On 2/16/08, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: >>> Oh, you're right, inband handling is different, but it's a matter of one >>> flag, passed to functioin. Probably not that much to keep code DRY. >> Well, let's first merge your code and then we'll see about possible >> simplifications. >

...wb_skip_table? > > Oh, your table looked fine. I think it's mine that was wrong for the > "null mode" (which nobody ever uses I guess!). I'm not sure, but I guess it may be used in VBR or DTX mode? At least that's why I kept it. So, what's the next step towards intergartion? I guess it should be somehow made available from Speex API level, e.g. with new speex_decoder_ctl() or speex_lib_ctl() request? I have no idea about the best way here, and would appreciate your advices. > > It would be good to define - it is very misleading for newcomers > > as it is...

Hello all, just curious if anyone's successfully compiled (*) with the latest FreeTDS code/driver. The Makefile in (*) seems to only take care of 0.63 or older. I tried to muck around with it a bit into tricking to compile for not just 0.63 but anything later than 0.62 but it seems to crap out complaining about CDR modules, which I really don't need. It's been a while since I tried it

I've not be able to find in the docs where it describes the differences between ldapsam ldapsam_nua etc. etc. I don't have access to the man pages and I've checked the online documentation also. Something has been going wrong in my config and I think a better understanding of these may help. I do know that ldapsam_compat is supposed to be backward compatible with the old LDAP

...obody ever uses I guess!). >> >> I'm not sure, but I guess it may be used in VBR or DTX mode? >> At least that's why I kept it. > > Of course it *can* be used (and needs fixing). It just seems few people > did :-) > >> So, what's the next step towards intergartion? I guess it should >> be somehow made available from Speex API level, e.g. with >> new speex_decoder_ctl() or speex_lib_ctl() request? I have >> no idea about the best way here, and would appreciate your >> advices. > > I don't think it should be a _ctl() call beca...