search for: intergart

...t; "null mode" (which nobody ever uses I guess!). > > I'm not sure, but I guess it may be used in VBR or DTX mode? > At least that's why I kept it. Of course it *can* be used (and needs fixing). It just seems few people did :-) > So, what's the next step towards intergartion? I guess it should > be somehow made available from Speex API level, e.g. with > new speex_decoder_ctl() or speex_lib_ctl() request? I have > no idea about the best way here, and would appreciate your > advices. I don't think it should be a _ctl() call because there's too mu...

Alexander Chemeris wrote: > On 2/16/08, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca> wrote: >>> Oh, you're right, inband handling is different, but it's a matter of one >>> flag, passed to functioin. Probably not that much to keep code DRY. >> Well, let's first merge your code and then we'll see about possible >> simplifications. >

...wb_skip_table? > > Oh, your table looked fine. I think it's mine that was wrong for the > "null mode" (which nobody ever uses I guess!). I'm not sure, but I guess it may be used in VBR or DTX mode? At least that's why I kept it. So, what's the next step towards intergartion? I guess it should be somehow made available from Speex API level, e.g. with new speex_decoder_ctl() or speex_lib_ctl() request? I have no idea about the best way here, and would appreciate your advices. > > It would be good to define - it is very misleading for newcomers > > as it...

...der. I tried to muck around with it a bit into tricking to compile for not just 0.63 but anything later than 0.62 but it seems to crap out complaining about CDR modules, which I really don't need. It's been a while since I tried it but I seriously doubt there's any dev. done to focus on intergarting MSSQL or non-open-source DBs with (*). If someone's done it or knows how to do it or even can tell me if it's even worth it, then I'd really appreciate your comments. Best Regards, \R

I've not be able to find in the docs where it describes the differences between ldapsam ldapsam_nua etc. etc. I don't have access to the man pages and I've checked the online documentation also. Something has been going wrong in my config and I think a better understanding of these may help. I do know that ldapsam_compat is supposed to be backward compatible with the old LDAP

...obody ever uses I guess!). >> >> I'm not sure, but I guess it may be used in VBR or DTX mode? >> At least that's why I kept it. > > Of course it *can* be used (and needs fixing). It just seems few people > did :-) > >> So, what's the next step towards intergartion? I guess it should >> be somehow made available from Speex API level, e.g. with >> new speex_decoder_ctl() or speex_lib_ctl() request? I have >> no idea about the best way here, and would appreciate your >> advices. > > I don't think it should be a _ctl() call b...