search for: interg

how does one numerically intergate the following: A=function(x,y) { xy } over the range: 2<x<0 4<y<10 say. ie how would one set up the integrate function? i forgot!

...zinb package that will allow non-integers or and equivalent test/ model to zinb for non-integer data? Or should I try something else like a quasi-Poisson GLM? Apologies for the Newbie question! Any help much appreciated! Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zinb-for-Non-interger-data-tp24550044p24550044.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi All I want to intergrate openldap in to sendmail. How can I do it? I think I will have to write a few things in to sendmail.mc. The purpose of this is that I do not need system accounts anymore. But instead I nead Openldap users. How can I achieve this goal? Pls help me. -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya ----------...

...Everybody! I have a big table which named table_x, and all the elements in the table is very large! Now I want to do the summay on the talbe_x[,3]. Unfornately, I can't get the right result! And the R give the warning messages as follow: > sum(table_x[,3]) >[1] NA >Warning message: >interger overflow in sum(.);please use sum(as.numeric(.)) (the original upper message is Chinese,and I have translated those to English.) Any one tell me how to use the as.numeric(.)? And I want to know does R support the 64bits interger?How to do? Pls forgive my ignorance. Thank you in advance! -...

Hi, all ! I have a situation like this: [SIP Terminals] <-> [*] < -ISDN-PRI-> [Panasonic D500] <-> Telecom (conn to Telecom is with second PRI card in Panasonic and 16 POTS lines). Panasonic has 2 ISDN PRI cards (one to Telco, and second to Asterisk), 16 POTS lines to telco and 32 (advanced hybrid telephone type) extensions. Idea is to have possibility to have some users on

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: > I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to > make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: > 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the > first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would > abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emittion. Sure.

Chris Lattner pravi: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >>> Sure. Anton can give you ideas for this. >>> >> I think it should not be too difficult because you allow custom call >> conversions and this is quite easy to add, we only have to garantee that >> the backend will emit it. > > Right. > >>>> 2) the ret

I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emition. 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has already

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >> Sure. Anton can give you ideas for this. >> > I think it should not be too difficult because you allow custom call > conversions and this is quite easy to add, we only have to garantee that > the backend will emit it. Right. >>> 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has >>>

Hi, All I am using is.integer function to examine whether an object is an integer or not, but I get such results, > x<-3 > is.integer(x) [1] FALSE > x<-3:4 > x [1] 3 4 > is.integer(x) [1] TRUE Seems that the is.integer cannot handle scalers, > is.integer(5) [1] FALSE > is.integer(5:6) [1] TRUE Is this a bug in R or I made some mistakes? I am using R 2.2.1 under

I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided how to make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would abstract llvm compiler dependant C++ code emittion. 2) the ret instruction should be able to return structs (as Chris has already

Chris Lattner pravi: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, [ISO-8859-2] Žiga Osolin wrote: >> I was going through documentation and source lately, and I decided >> how to >> make llvm bytecode more compatible to C++: >> 1) thiscall sould be introduced, which would take N arguments and the >> first argument would always be the C++ "this" argument. This would >>

Hi all, I don't understand the behavior of is.integer(): > x <- integer() > is.integer(x) [1] TRUE > x <- 10 > is.integer(x) [1] FALSE > x <- 1:10 > is.integer(x) [1] TRUE Why is.interger() returns FALSE if x has only one element? And how can someone check if x is an integer but contains only one value? (R 1.5.0 on Linux i386) Thanks, Sven -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik...

Dear R-community, my data set looks like 'mat' below. Plant<-c(NA,1,1,1,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,1); Value1<-rnorm(1:10); Value2<-rnorm(1:10); mat<-cbind(Plant,Value1,Value2); I receive data from two different sites. One site is identified by an interger number, the other site has no data in column Plant=NA. My pb: I'm trying to assign labels "A" or "B" to these 2 sites into a new column, but my if(){} else{} statement fails with the following statement: Error in if (is.na(mat$Plant == TRUE)) { : argument is of l...

Here is an R problem I am struggling with: My dataset is organized like this... subject session variable_x variable_y 01 1 1 <interger values> 01 1 2 01 1 3 01 2 1 01 2 2 01 2 3 02 1 1 02 1...

...cture: idxy ix iy country (other variables) 1 1 1 c1 x1 2 1 2 c1 x2 3 1 3 c1 x3 . . . . . 3739 55 67 c7 x3739 3740 55 68 c7 x3740 where ix and iy are interger-valued indices of the actual x and y coordinates for the gridded data I want to define a "border" variable that equals 1 if the cell north, east, west, or south of it has a different value of the country variable. So, for the row with idxy = 1, border would equal 1 if there is any...

...huge impact to nearly every part of LLVM. We >will probably do it around the 2.0 time frame when we can afford to >break bytecode compatibility and generally clean up a lot of other >things as well. Uh, does this mean you're contemplating getting rid of llvm's ability to detect an interger overflow? So if I add, say, two 32-bit signed ints with values 2000000000 and 2000000000 I'm going to get -294967296 and have no way to know that something bad happened? That would make me sad. I'm not entirely sure I see the rationale; isn't it the case that only languages that care...

...hope that the backend will generate efficient code for the subtraction, but I have no way of knowing this. Now, I'm going to anticipate what I think will be your next argument, which is that at some point I must know the size of the result since I am assigning the result of size() to some interger variable eventually. Which is true, however, if the size of that eventual variable is smaller than a pointer, then I want to check it for overflow before I do the assignment. I don't want to just do a blind bitcast and have the top bits be lopped off. The problem of checking for overflow...

Hi list, When I was using 'silhouette' from the 'cluster' package to calculate clustering performances, R crashed. I traced the problem to the fact that my clustering labels only have 2's and 3's. when I replaced them with 1's and 2's, the problem was solved. Is the function purposely written in this way so when I have clustering labels, "2" and

We have a flash developer who is intergating with a rails application when he posts a particular variable (in this case ''rating'') We get a ''Rails Application Error'' Trawling the production log turns up this error; NoMethodError (undefined method `stringify_keys!'' for "10":String):...