search for: interfactively

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "interfactively".

Did you mean: interactively
2015 Aug 31
0
[OT] GNU bc base conversion
...e current base, due to a quirk in > the way values for these settings are interpreted. Thus you can always > force your way back to sanity. > Not sure how this helps me with my most recent example of bin_to_hex where the ibase within the define clause wasn't honored. Working with bc interfactively or by piping produce the desired/correct values. Testing indicates the ibase is defaulted or overrode as base10 despite what is specified in the define clause. :-( > > My objection is that this is even necessary in the first place. Agreed. -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //
2010 Dec 15
0
package JM -- version 0.8-0
Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package JM (soon available from CRAN) for the joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data using shared parameter models. These models are applicable in mainly two settings. First, when focus is in the survival outcome and we wish to account for the effect of a time-dependent covariate measured with error.
2010 Dec 15
0
package JM -- version 0.8-0
Dear R-users, I'd like to announce the release of the new version of package JM (soon available from CRAN) for the joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data using shared parameter models. These models are applicable in mainly two settings. First, when focus is in the survival outcome and we wish to account for the effect of a time-dependent covariate measured with error.
2015 Aug 31
2
[OT] GNU bc base conversion
On Aug 31, 2015, at 6:55 AM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I suppose my only options for this are to use shell functions or write a > script using a language that handles things properly (sanely?). No, there?s a fairly common hack around this problem: ibase=A and obase=A *always* means ?base 10? regardless of the current base, due to a quirk in the way values
2008 Mar 07
1
parameters for lbfgsb (function for optimization)
Can anyone help me with lbfgsb (function for optimization)? It takes the following parameters: void lbfgsb (int n, int lmm, double *x, double *lower, double *upper, int *nbd, double *Fmin, optimfn fn, optimgr gr, int *fail, void *ex, double factr, double pgtol, int *fncount, int *grcount, int maxit, char *msg, int trace, int nREPORT); What do I put for parameter ex (11th parameter)? I looked at
2018 Aug 06
4
[RFC 0/4] Virtio uses DMA API for all devices
On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 23:35 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > As I said replying to Christoph, we are "leaking" into the interface > > something here that is really what's the VM is doing to itself, which > > is to stash its memory away in an inaccessible place. > > > > Cheers, > > Ben. > > I think Christoph merely objects to the
2018 Aug 06
4
[RFC 0/4] Virtio uses DMA API for all devices
On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 23:35 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > As I said replying to Christoph, we are "leaking" into the interface > > something here that is really what's the VM is doing to itself, which > > is to stash its memory away in an inaccessible place. > > > > Cheers, > > Ben. > > I think Christoph merely objects to the
2019 Nov 15
0
Wine release 4.20
The Wine development release 4.20 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - New version of the Mono engine with an FNA update. - Code persistence in VBScript and JScript. - Vulkan spec updates. - Improved support for LLVM MinGW. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations:
2002 May 17
19
Shorewall 1.3 Beta 1
The 3.1 Beta is now available -- check the Shorewall home page. -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://www.shorewall.net ICQ: #60745924 \ teastep@shorewall.net