search for: interefere

...ile load or store would > do the trick? Being volatile, the compiler won't remove it (or if it > does, it's a bug, and you should file a bug report), and since it loads > from a memory object not used for anything else, alias analysis should > be able to see that it doesn't interefere with any other load/store. LLVM certainly will remove volatile loads and stores to local variables (at least in simple situations). I suggest using an empty asm statement. Ciao, Duncan.

...e would >> do the trick? Being volatile, the compiler won't remove it (or if it >> does, it's a bug, and you should file a bug report), and since it loads >> from a memory object not used for anything else, alias analysis should >> be able to see that it doesn't interefere with any other load/store. > LLVM certainly will remove volatile loads and stores to local variables > (at least in simple situations). I suggest using an empty asm statement. Really? Isn't that illegal? The whole point of "volatile" is to tell the compiler that it should n...

...loca and a volatile load or store would do the trick? Being volatile, the compiler won't remove it (or if it does, it's a bug, and you should file a bug report), and since it loads from a memory object not used for anything else, alias analysis should be able to see that it doesn't interefere with any other load/store. Other volatile loads/store won't be moved across it, but I doubt that'll be a concern. Most loads/stores are non-volatile. -- John T. > > > John Criswell-4 wrote: >> >> Alternatively, you can use calls to external functions. These are &g...

Hi, John Criswell-4 wrote: > > > You may want to use LLVM Metadata features. Search for MDNode in the > doxygen docs for some information on how to create metadata. > > I use metadata information in this way: unsigned mk = Context.getMDKindID(mdtype); Value *V = MDString::get(Context,StringRef(str)); MDNode* n = MDNode::get(Context, &V, 1);

...> do the trick?  Being volatile, the compiler won't remove it (or if it >>> does, it's a bug, and you should file a bug report), and since it loads >>> from a memory object not used for anything else, alias analysis should >>> be able to see that it doesn't interefere with any other load/store. >> LLVM certainly will remove volatile loads and stores to local variables >> (at least in simple situations).  I suggest using an empty asm statement. > > Really?  Isn't that illegal?  The whole point of "volatile" is to tell > the comp...

Dear All, Time to add my two cents: I think incorporating something like APR into the LLVM tree is fine, given that it works, its licensing doesn't interefere with our licensing (and doesn't give me a headache), and we can merge it into the LLVM source base relatively seamlessly (i.e. users don't need to install it before building LLVM and APR plays nice with our build system). I think building our own lib/System is going to be a bit of a tim...

On Sep 12, 2004, at 9:52 PM, Vikram Adve wrote: > I think we should be careful to isolate APR behind a "complete" > lib/System interface, i.e., not use it directly anywhere. If we do > that, it becomes strictly an implementation convenience and the > dependence is limited to that one part of the system. > > One concern I have with APR is their use of pool

...at least give new platforms a shot at having LLVM work. Reid. On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 08:18, John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > Time to add my two cents: > > I think incorporating something like APR into the LLVM tree is fine, > given that it works, its licensing doesn't interefere with our licensing > (and doesn't give me a headache), and we can merge it into the LLVM > source base relatively seamlessly (i.e. users don't need to install it > before building LLVM and APR plays nice with our build system). > > I think building our own lib/System is g...

...having LLVM work. > > Reid. > > On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 08:18, John Criswell wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> Time to add my two cents: >> >> I think incorporating something like APR into the LLVM tree is fine, >> given that it works, its licensing doesn't interefere with our >> licensing >> (and doesn't give me a headache), and we can merge it into the LLVM >> source base relatively seamlessly (i.e. users don't need to install it >> before building LLVM and APR plays nice with our build system). >> >> I think buildi...

...t to understand you correctly..you have an SSH server running on the server and you connect via sftp to this server using SSH Communication's SSH/SFTP client, correct? And for some reason, after the installation of ReconX client on windows, the ssh sftp windows stops working? ReconX should not interefere with the SSH server in any way that impedes your work. Perhaps you can installs the deps and clarify the second problem, I can suggest and fix what might be going wrong. With warm regards, -Bruno

...(0,( "ERROR: both wins server and wins support turned on, " > "using wins server \"%s\".\n", Globals.szWINSserver)); > Globals.bWINSsupport = False; > } > > /* Check for announcing as something other than NT, which can */ > /* interefere with serving browse lists. */ > if (Globals.announce_as != ANNOUNCE_AS_NT_SERVER) > DEBUG(0,( "WARNING: announce as not set to \"NT\", this may " > "interfere with browsing.\n")); > > > /* Cross-check PDC vs BDC vs Unix logo...

...(0,( "ERROR: both wins server and wins support turned on, " > "using wins server \"%s\".\n", Globals.szWINSserver)); > Globals.bWINSsupport = False; > } > > /* Check for announcing as something other than NT, which can */ > /* interefere with serving browse lists. */ > if (Globals.announce_as == ANNOUNCE_AS_NT_SERVER) > DEBUG(0,( "WARNING: announce as not set to \"NT\", this may " > "interfere with browsing.\n")); > > > /* Cross-check PDC vs BDC vs Unix logo...

...-- John T. > > Reid. > > On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 08:18, John Criswell wrote: > >>Dear All, >> >>Time to add my two cents: >> >>I think incorporating something like APR into the LLVM tree is fine, >>given that it works, its licensing doesn't interefere with our licensing >>(and doesn't give me a headache), and we can merge it into the LLVM >>source base relatively seamlessly (i.e. users don't need to install it >>before building LLVM and APR plays nice with our build system). >> >>I think building our own...

Hey gang, We have about 30 Cisco 79XX phones all running latest 7.5 SIP. We are also using all Cisco Switches and Routers. Everything works great except that when you reboot a phone it takes like 3-5 minutes for it to come up. The phones spend tons of time 'Configuring VLAN..' We don't run any VLANs. Is there some way to skip this? In the 'Network Settings' I have