search for: interconversions

> On 2 May 2017, at 8:48 am, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > You would probably need to write a new tablegen backend to generate > instruction tables that would be used outside of LLVM. I think I need to write one anyway because I need to generate lots of tables other than the instruction table (there are no registers and therefore no register table), at least one

>Right, what I was trying to say is that there are more benefits from >having this not be a target than there is from having it be a target. Please enumerate them, I have seen none posted so far . The implied “it is what all the the other backends do” w.r.t ISel/MC is at best(worst?) an implementation detail, and I’m still not quite sure why Chandler was so adamant about that. He seemed

On 06/20/2017 05:41 PM, Neil Hickey wrote: > Hi all, I'd like to kick this discussion off again, and summarise the points that have been expressed so far. > > Firstly, as a member of Khronos, I'd like to state that this would be a very interesting development. > Hi Neil, I am very interested in having a good LLVM IR -> SPIR-V solution, and I think it's great that