search for: interchangeably

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 731 matches for "interchangeably".

Did you mean: interchangeable
2020 Oct 01
3
A 4x slower initialization loop in LLVM vs GCC and MSVC
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 20:45, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Sep 27, 2020, at 12:52, Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I was watching this video [1]. There's an example of an initialization loop for which >> Clang unfortunately
2013 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] Polly issue
Hi, When I test "matmul" in the polly directory, I get the following performance data: //=============================== --> 12. Compare the runtime of the executables time ./matmul.normalopt.exe 0:23.53 real, 23.48 user, 0.00 sys time ./matmul.polly.interchanged.exe 0:22.86 real, 22.82 user, 0.01 sys time ./matmul.polly.interchanged+tiled.exe 0:22.87 real, 22.83 user, 0.00 sys
2017 Nov 18
2
Is llvm capable of doing loop interchange optimization?
Hello, I've been playing around with the really simple example of not cache friendly loop like this: #define N 100 void foo(int** __restrict__ a, int** __restrict__ b) { for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) for (int j = 0; j < N; ++j) a[j][i] += b[j][i]; } link to compiler explorer:
2004 Nov 23
4
Quick Questions - IVR=Auto Attendant?
Are IVR and "Auto Attendant" interchangeable terms? They both do the "Press 1 for" thing. Sales is asking me how to word it and I've always used both terms interchangeably.
2017 Jan 13
2
unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably
unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably, leading to warnings with platforms (e.g. djgpp) where int32_t is long: bitreader.c: In function `FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed': bitreader.c:721: warning: passing arg 2 of `FLAC__bitreader_read_unary_unsigned' from incompatible pointer type bitreader.c: In function `FLAC__bitreader_rea...
2017 Jan 14
2
unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably
On 1/14/17, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Ozkan Sezer wrote: > >> unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably, leading to >> warnings with platforms (e.g. djgpp) where int32_t is long: > > Is `sizeof int == 4` though? Yes, obviously it is > I couldn't image FLAC working correctly > if it wasn't. > > Erik
2016 May 31
2
[GSoC 2016] [Polly] Implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops based on the algorithm for the analytical modeling
Hi Tobias, I think that we could split a patch that contains an implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops into three separate patches: 1. The first one adds a class that describes a processor model. It also adds a new command line parameter that contains all necessary parameters of a target architecture, which are used to construct objects of the class. 2. The
2016 Jun 09
2
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Vikram TV via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *To: *"DEV" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Sent: *Wednesday, June 8, 2016 2:58:17 AM > *Subject: *[llvm-dev] [Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis >
2016 Jun 23
2
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2016, at 9:21 AM, Vikram TV via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Vikram TV via
2016 May 31
0
[GSoC 2016] [Polly] Implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops based on the algorithm for the analytical modeling
Hi Roman, On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > I think that we could split a patch that contains an implementation of > tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops into three > separate patches: > > 1. The first one adds a class that describes a processor model. It > also adds a new command line
2016 Jun 23
3
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Vikram, >> >> Is the analysis result specific to a loop nest or to a loop nest together >> with a set of reference groups? >> > The result is specific to each loop in the loop nest and the calculations > are based on the references in the loop nest. > >
2012 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] Cannot interchange "literal" and "identified" structs
With primitive types, I can interchange literal usage and type aliases in IR: %mytype = type i32 define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store i32 *%t1*, *i32** %ptr ret void } But for structs, I cannot: %mytype = type { i32, i32 } define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store* { i32, i32 }* %t1, *{ i32, i32 }** %ptr ret void }
2012 Dec 30
0
[LLVMdev] Cannot interchange "literal" and "identified" structs
Justin, http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#structure-type "Identified types can be recursive, can be opaqued, and are never uniqued." Do you think it would be less descriptive? "Identified type, aka named llvm::StructType, is never uniqued against other identified types nor literal types, aka unnamed StructType(s)." ? See also;
2017 Jan 14
0
unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably
Ozkan Sezer wrote: > > Ozkan Sezer wrote: > > > >> unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably, leading to > >> warnings with platforms (e.g. djgpp) where int32_t is long: > > > > Is `sizeof int == 4` though? > > Yes, obviously it is Well I've just pushed a patch that purges the code base of `unsigned`. Please test and let us know how it goes. Erik -- -----...
2008 Sep 10
4
re flecting a line
Suppose x and y are numeric vectors of the same length. plot(x,y) #scatterplot lmObj1 <- lm(y~x) # best fit line abline(lmObj1) # good lmObj2 <- lm(x~y) #get best fit but with axes interchanged abline(lmObj2) # not what I want. I want the correct line, drawn on the same graph, but with # response and predictor variables interchanged One way to proceed would be to
2017 Jan 14
4
unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably
On 1/14/17, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Ozkan Sezer wrote: > >> > Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> > >> >> unsigned int and FLAC__uint32 are used interchangeably, leading to >> >> warnings with platforms (e.g. djgpp) where int32_t is long: >> > >> > Is `sizeof int == 4` though? >> >> Yes, obviously it is > > Well I've just pushed a patch that purges the code base of `unsigned`. > Please test and let us...
2016 Jun 08
5
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis
Hi, This is a proposal about implementing an analysis that calculates loop cost based on cache data. The primary motivation for implementing this is to write profitability measures for cache related optimizations like interchange, fusion, fission, pre-fetching and others. I have implemented a prototypical version at http://reviews.llvm.org/D21124. The patch basically creates groups of references
2010 Apr 19
1
What is mclust up to? Different clusters found if x and y interchanged
Hello All... I gave a task to my students that involved using mclust to look for clusters in some bivariate data of isotopes vs various mining locations. They discovered something I didn?t expect; the data (called tur) is appended below. p <- qplot(x = dD, y = dCu65, data = tur, color = mine) print(p) # simple bivariate plot of the data; looks fine mod1 <- Mclust(tur[,2:3]) mod1$G mod2
2015 Oct 07
0
Are pointers to FLAC__int32 and int interchangeable?
lvqcl wrote: > Is it Ok to pass FLAC__int32* in a function that expects int* ? Well FLAC__int32 is just a 32 bit integer and on all the platforms/ architecures/compilers that FLAC supports FLAC__int32 and int are the same. As for pointers, all pointers are the same until you try an increment them. If you have some type, lets call it sometype_t, and a pointer to types of sometype_t :
2015 Oct 08
1
Are pointers to FLAC__int32 and int interchangeable?
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Well FLAC__int32 is just a 32 bit integer and on all the platforms/ > architecures/compilers that FLAC supports FLAC__int32 and int are > the same. > > Personally I think the FLAC__xxxx stuff should go, to be replaced with > C standard int32_t, uint32_t, int16_t etc, at least for internal code. > I am slowly doing that when I touch code. > >