Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "interaprocedur".
Did you mean:
interaprocedural
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...izations when functions are added/ removed/
> > changed? Are there parameters to tune the compiler's aggressiveness?
>
> There is a JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction() method, but it doesn't
> optimize the code.
Ok, this makes sense. However, am I correct in assuming that the
interaprocedural optimizations performed in gccas will make it
problematic to call 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For example,
suppose I run run some module that looks like
module a
int foo () {
...
bar()
...
}
int bar () {
...
}
through all of those optimizations. Will the result nessisari...
2005 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...tly, you may get multiple perspectives, and the discussion is
> archived for future LLVMers who are looking for some similar advice.
I agree with misha. This should definately be discussed on-list if
possible.
>> Ok, this makes sense. However, am I correct in assuming that the
>> interaprocedural optimizations performed in gccas will make it
>> problematic to call 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For example,
>> suppose I run run some module that looks like
...
>> through all of those optimizations. Will the result nessisarily have a
>> bar() functio...
2005 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...pectives, and the discussion is
>> archived for future LLVMers who are looking for some similar advice.
>
> I agree with misha. This should definately be discussed on-list if
> possible.
>
>>> Ok, this makes sense. However, am I correct in assuming that the
>>> interaprocedural optimizations performed in gccas will make it
>>> problematic to call 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For
>>> example,
>>> suppose I run run some module that looks like
>
> ...
>
>>> through all of those optimizations. Will the result ne...
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
...er them. The benefits
are that you may get your response faster than emailing someone
directly, you may get multiple perspectives, and the discussion is
archived for future LLVMers who are looking for some similar advice.
> Ok, this makes sense. However, am I correct in assuming that the
> interaprocedural optimizations performed in gccas will make it
> problematic to call 'JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction()' . For example,
> suppose I run run some module that looks like
>
> module a
>
> int foo () {
> ...
> bar()
> ...
> }
>
> int bar () {
> ......
2005 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
Hi, Alexander!
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 11:59:06PM -0400, Alexander Friedman wrote:
> I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable
> Scheme system (PLT Scheme).
Cool!
> The original plan was to use GNU Lightning, but 1) it seems to be
> dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a huge amount of stuff that I would
> have had to write (poorly) from scratch.
Maybe
2005 May 05
4
[LLVMdev] Scheme + LLVM JIT
Hi List,
I am in the preliminary stages of adding a JIT compiler to a sizable
Scheme system (PLT Scheme). The original plan was to use GNU
Lightning, but 1) it seems to be dead, and 2) LLVM has already done a
huge amount of stuff that I would have had to write (poorly) from
scratch.
At the moment, LLVM seems to be the ideal choice for implementing the
Scheme JIT, but there are problems that need