search for: inter2

...14 16 0.3245 14 17 0.3245 15 18 0.3229 15 19 0.3331 16 20 0.3208 16 now this bit of programming works for it how ever it puts the mean of my index back into numeric order. aggregate(test[1],test[2],mean)->inter names(inter)[2]='mean' merge(test,inter,all=T)->inter2 inter2$RSV=inter2$Result/inter2$mean Would anyone know away around this so I could keep the data in cronological order? Kind Regards, Al [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I'm trying to create a for loop for a data set, I have a list of results in this data set and I want to take the 1st two add them together and divide by the mean of the 1st to, then do the same for the 3rd and 4th values in the list and so on and each time return a value for the calculation on each pair. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Al [[alternative HTML version

Hi again, I measured my fragment reconstructions against the compiler output from GCC and well - the new codes perform better, so I brushed up my gcc inline assembler skills and made a port. Code is here: http://torus.untergrund.net/code/mmxfrag.c All routines perform much better now. Inter2 alone got a speedup of factor 5 on Pentium-M. Athlon CPU's execute roughly 3 times faster. Hadn't had the chance to benchmark core2 though. It would be nice to hear if the code compiles on 64bit intel. Regarding the MSVC patch I made a couple of days ago: I found out how to get the ma...