search for: intentionally

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9641 matches for "intentionally".

Did you mean: intensionally
2010 May 24
1
Path Analysis
Hello list, I'm trying to make sure that I'm performing a path analysis correctly using the sem package. the figure at http://flame.cs.dal.ca/~sstewart/regressDiag.png has a detailing of the model. The challenge I'm having is that reuse is an indicator (0/1) variable. Here's the code I'm using: corr =
2010 Aug 06
1
Is R GPL or LGPL (or can I write a commercial front end to R)?
Note I'm not asking for any legal advice here obviously, simply what the intention of the R foundation is with regard to allowing commercial connection to R. I've looked at various threads on the r-devel archive and it looks like this may have been discussed before, but as far as could tell, not to any great resolution, and not, it seems, specifically covering this angle. In the
2019 Jun 19
2
User listing returned failure with -A
First, I archive the old messages in the INBOX on my list account # doveadm -Dv move -u kremels at kreme.com Archive mailbox INBOX BEFORE 90d Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm Debug: Skipping module doveadm_acl_plugin, because dlopen() failed:
2003 Sep 10
2
dataframe subsetting
I can create a small dataset, "x" below, and subset out rows based on values of a certain variable. However, on the dataset I'm working on now, "latdata" below, I get a subscript error. Any advice is appreciated! Ryan Successful: > is.data.frame(x) [1] TRUE > x X1 X2 X3 1 1 3 5 2 2 4 6 > x[x$X2 %in% c(3),] X1 X2 X3 1 1 3 5 Unsuccessful: >
2012 Jul 10
2
dovecot 2.1.8 still tries to touch any mountpoint
why does dovecot touch any ever used fuse-mountpoint and scream at the next start that is no longer mounted? "If this is intentional, remove it with doveadm mount" why if i never called "doveadm" on any setup at all? Jul 10 09:10:56 rh dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.1.8 starting up (core dumps disabled) Jul 10 09:10:56 rh dovecot: master: Warning: /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu is no longer
2020 May 13
2
Convert standalone mbox to standalone Maildir with Dsync - hierarchy separator error
Dear Dovecot users/devs, I have the following mbox file: /tmp/dsync_test/mbox/2002-September I would like to convert it to a Maildir: /tmp/dsync_test/maildir (Currently, the latter is just an empty directory.) I am attempting this on an old PC running Debian 9 ("Stretch"). I installed the dovecot-core package in order to make the `dsync` tool available on that PC. I have
2020 Nov 05
4
[RFC] FileCheck: (dis)allowing unused prefixes
...>>>> >>>> Otherwise, I will "blanket-add" --allow-unused-prefixes=true to the remaining failing tests. >>> >>> >>> If/when you do that, probably worth adding a comment at each site to clarify that this was added automatically, not vetted/intentionally added by a human. Something like "// FIXME: Verify that unused prefixes are used intentionally" or the like. >> >> Ack. or, we can grep for -allow-unused-prefixes=true, wdyt? > > > Not sure I understand who/when they would grep for that? > > I was suggesting add...
2018 Apr 25
2
Help on understanding assume shape array processing and array descriptors in LLVM IR
Hi, I am trying to understand how assume shaped arrays are received and processed in LLVM IR. I am using "flang" for my front end. There seems to be an array descriptor received as implicit argument for every assume shaped array. For my test routine: ---snip-- SUBROUTINE test(a,b,Li,Lj,Istr,Iend,Jstr,Jend) INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Li,Lj INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Istr, Iend,
2019 Jun 21
2
LLD handling of orphaned sections
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 13:05, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I think Geroge (cc'ed) knows better than me in that area. > > lld is underdocumented, and in particular there is virtually no documentation about its linker script support. Our basic strategy is to follow the GNU's documentation and the implementations unless it is too hard or
2019 Jun 19
0
User listing returned failure with -A
On 19.6.2019 5.44, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > First, I archive the old messages in the INBOX on my list account > > # doveadm -Dv move -u kremels at kreme.com Archive mailbox INBOX BEFORE 90d Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm > Debug:
2014 Jun 25
2
[LLVMdev] Phabricator and private reviews
On 25/06/2014 21:03, Eli Bendersky wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com > <mailto:alp at nuanti.com>> wrote: > > For whatever reason, patches posted to the Phabricator website > still aren't being sent to the mailing list, making it difficult > for us to review them. > > I've raised this issue a couple
2020 Nov 06
2
[RFC] FileCheck: (dis)allowing unused prefixes
...I will "blanket-add" --allow-unused-prefixes=true to the >> remaining failing tests. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> If/when you do that, probably worth adding a comment at each site to >> clarify that this was added automatically, not vetted/intentionally added >> by a human. Something like "// FIXME: Verify that unused prefixes are used >> intentionally" or the like. >> >> >> >> Ack. or, we can grep for -allow-unused-prefixes=true, wdyt? >> > >> > >> > Not sure I understand wh...
2020 May 13
0
Convert standalone mbox to standalone Maildir with Dsync - hierarchy separator error
> On 13/05/2020 10:11 Sam Kuper <sampablokuper at posteo.net> wrote: > > > Dear Dovecot users/devs, > > I have the following mbox file: > > /tmp/dsync_test/mbox/2002-September > > I would like to convert it to a Maildir: > > /tmp/dsync_test/maildir > > (Currently, the latter is just an empty directory.) > > I am attempting this
2010 Aug 03
1
License for Rembedded.h
Possibly more of a legal question than a technical development question, but here goes. In the doc\COPYRIGHTS file it is made clear that the intention is that you can write R packages and distribute them under licenses not compatible with GPL, by making the relevant header files available under the LGPL. This was an explicit change that was made in February 2001, and allows for DLLs that
2000 Sep 05
0
ssh-askpass and ssh/scp: is this behavior intentional?
Okay, I'm asking this again. As of 2.2.0p1, the *only* program that knows how to invoke ssh-askpass is ssh-add. Not ssh itself, nor scp understand how to invoke ssh-askpass. This is a direct contrast to ssh-1.2.27, in which all clients know how to invoke ssh-askpass. My question: is the limitation that only ssh-add knows how to invoke ssh-askpass intentional (i.e., a deliberate design
2012 Aug 25
0
write-intent bitmap
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On CentOS 6 I noticed very high load after installing and while the md raid 1 array was syncing. I found lots of complaints about performance degradation for md raid with enabled write-intent bitmap. See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/write-intent-bitmaps/ for example. So I wanted to it off. I let it sync and then removed the bitmap. Do you know of a
2018 Dec 20
3
Intentionally use weak server key
> > If you can convince openssl to use it. Does anybody have any hints on how it may be done, if possible at all? Stavros
2017 Jun 14
2
Need Help to analyze the error or is it a bug?
After done an update to dovecot-2.2.30.2 my connection is broken since days. all what I try every time the same error: Jun 15 00:02:18 auth: Error: auth: environment corrupt; missing value for DOVECOT_ Jun 15 00:02:18 auth: Fatal: unsetenv(RESTRICT_SETUID) failed: Bad address Jun 15 00:02:18 master: Error: service(auth): command startup failed, throttling for 2 secs I try this: # doveadm
2020 Nov 09
5
[RFC] FileCheck: (dis)allowing unused prefixes
...>> the remaining failing tests. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> If/when you do that, probably worth adding a comment at each site >>>>>> to clarify that this was added automatically, not vetted/intentionally >>>>>> added by a human. Something like "// FIXME: Verify that unused prefixes are >>>>>> used intentionally" or the like. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Ack. or, we can grep for -allow-unused-prefixes=true, wdyt? &g...
2020 Nov 06
2
[RFC] FileCheck: (dis)allowing unused prefixes
...unused-prefixes=true to >>>> the remaining failing tests. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> If/when you do that, probably worth adding a comment at each site >>>> to clarify that this was added automatically, not vetted/intentionally >>>> added by a human. Something like "// FIXME: Verify that unused prefixes are >>>> used intentionally" or the like. >>>> >> >>>> >> Ack. or, we can grep for -allow-unused-prefixes=true, wdyt? >>>> > >>>...