search for: intentially

I would like to perform partial mantel tests on only within group values, with "between group" values assigned to NA. This is possible in package ncf partial.mantel.test, however this sues a different permutation to that used in ecodist.ecodist will not accept data with NA values, returning a "matrix is not square error. is it possible to perform this test in ecodist? many thanks

...t : knowing that selinux is set to permissive and c 1:8 rwm is in the cgroup devices list of the guest1 # cat /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/libvirt/lxc/guest1/devices.list c 1:3 rwm c 1:5 rwm c 1:7 rwm c 1:8 rwm c 1:9 rwm c 5:0 rwm c 5:2 rwm c 10:229 rwm c 136:* rwm is this a change that was introduced intentially on 1.0.4 ? if yes, how can I make it work ? please advice Thank you in advance Amine -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20130418/9d7165b7/attachment.htm>

...ex got recreated... but I'm trying to limit the impact of mailbox corruption so that deleted emails do not come back if the index is somehow recreated again. If I were to re-run expunge, purge, and force-resync a 2nd time... it does get emptied out, but I'm not looking to run force-resync intentially since it causes dataloss with mdbox, and re-running only expunge & purge doesn't seem to do anything. Bojan Zelic Sr. IT Infrastructure Engineer

...ot recreated... but I'm trying to limit the impact of mailbox corruption so that deleted emails do not come back if the index is somehow recreated again. If I were to re-run expunge, purge, and force-resync a 2nd time... it does get emptied out, but I'm not looking to run force-resync intentially since it causes dataloss with mdbox, and re-running only expunge & purge doesn't seem to do anything. Bojan Zelic Sr. IT Infrastructure Engineer

...dex got recreated... but I'm trying to limit the impact of mailbox corruption so that deleted emails do not come back if the index is somehow recreated again. If I were to re-run expunge, purge, and force-resync a 2nd time... it does get emptied out, but I'm not looking to run force-resync intentially since it causes dataloss with mdbox, and re-running only expunge & purge doesn't seem to do anything. Bojan Zelic Sr. IT Infrastructure Engineer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200826/8b...

I''m curious if there has been any discussion of or work done toward implementing storage classing within zpools (this would be similar to the storage foundation QoSS feature). I''ve searched the forum and inspected the documentation looking for a means to do this, and haven''t found anything, so pardon the post if this is redundant/superfluous. I would imagine this would

I''ve got a DL145g3 which is reporting svm support in /proc/cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 65 model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2214 HE stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 2200.000 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 fpu