search for: intellegible

Hey All, Growing call center. Currently at about 200 call center staff, running about 1000 calls per hour. Gearing up to double that. Not too sure that a single server will support that growth. So, I'm trying to come up with ways to scale the system and still maintain a simplistic design. So I'd like to bounce some ideas around. Currently I am running on a Dell 1950, dual quad core

Hi The latest SVN trunk for speex has changed the SpeexPreprocessState to an opaque structure, for jolly good software engineering reasons. However, the Analogue AGC (AAGC) feature of iaxclient (in audio_enode.c) relies on some members of this. It uses speech_prob to detect when there is enough speech to consider AAGC and then loudness2 to decide how to adjust the input mixer. We want to use

<noobalert> Uh, yeah. So my noob self is showing through again. I''m trying to write a simple hello-world type web service with the ActionWebService thingy. I didn''t get very far. I''ve only done web services stuff in .NET, so I''m not exactly used to this sort of thing. Anyhow, I have a file, person_api.rb in my app/apis folder. I want to take a single

Hi! As per the API Docs, I''ve put this in my Actionmailer class attachment :content_type => "application/csv", :body => File.read(filename), :content_disposition => ''test.csv'' The email arrives okay and all but the filename is ignored and the newlines in my CSV file are gone (replaced by something else). I must admit I''m receiving

...o prefer "deny", which complicates things for an attacker, because packets just vanish without any report and tasks timeout. But from my viewpoint, this argument falls into the category "security by obscurity", and I found by preferring "unreach" I get the advantage of intellegible errormessages appearing fastly, which helps at least while developing and modifying. And so I am really honest and put "unreach filter-prohib" in, which is just the truth and ends in a "permission denied" message on the application side. But now there is another matter here, an...

David Brazier wrote: > Hi > > The latest SVN trunk for speex has changed the SpeexPreprocessState to > an opaque structure, for jolly good software engineering reasons. > However, the Analogue AGC (AAGC) feature of iaxclient (in audio_enode.c) > relies on some members of this. It uses speech_prob to detect when > there is enough speech to consider AAGC and then loudness2 to

> As you can tell, the AAGC integration with speex was really a classic > hack. Instead of re-creating the hack, what's probably best here is to > integrate AAGC back into speex, and have a proper API. Agreed here. If you can come up with a clean patch to add that feature, it's something I'd like to see in Speex. > For those of you just tuning in, what I call

I'm looking at memory efficiency for some of the survival code. The following fragment appears in coxph.fit coxfit <- .C("coxfit2", iter=as.integer(maxiter), as.integer(n), as.integer(nvar), stime, sstat, x= x[sorted,] , ... Does this make a second copy of x to pass to the routine (my

Dear useRs, I'm trying to estimate the proportion of individuals with a without a certain recurring ailment at several times points. The data are of the survival type, with "start"-"stop" dates and whether the individual had the ailment in that interval. Some cases are observed until database closure and some died or are lost to followup. The interest is not on death. I

I am replacing a dead pbx with *. There are four lines I will be using. There is a Cisco 827-4v already in place so I will move the lines from the pbx to it. I am working with Cisco 7910 phones and I understand they use the Skinny/SCCP protocol. I am not sure if I should use chan_skinny or chan_sccp? However my main question is with communication. Do I need to use the same protocol between the

OP - Backblaze Personal. May be like $1/extra per month than your budget. Unlimited IO and backup storage assuming you only need redundancy. https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-backup.html Still going to take a while on initial upload. (Sounds almost AWS Snowball like is what you need but too costly). Regards, R. S. Tyler Schroder Redcoded.com Cyber Intellegence > On Feb 15, 2019, at 10:37

On Feb 15, 2019, at 7:56 AM, Yan Li <elliot.li.tech at gmail.com> wrote: > > G Suite Business tier. Buy five users and you get unlimited Google Drive > storage. That's $50/month. So, you?re already 12x higher than his budget, and it?ll be going up 20% in early April. On top of that, there?s certainly a transfer rate limit. I couldn?t find a reliable source saying what that

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> As you can tell, the AAGC integration with speex was really a classic >> hack. Instead of re-creating the hack, what's probably best here is to >> integrate AAGC back into speex, and have a proper API. >> > > Agreed here. If you can come up with a clean patch to add that feature, > it's something I'd like to see in

I just subscribed to this list so in case this subject has already been discussed at length, my apologies. I have been waiting for btrfs forever. I have been waiting for it to become reasonably stable. In the wake of escalating problems with my old hardware RAID setup, I decided now was the time to make the transition. At this point I have been completely transitioned to btrfs for nearly

I've been asked to think about setting up an installation for a recently- widowed man. His needs are small - mail, Internet, on-line banking, basically - but his wife dealt with all of it on her laptop and he feels very insecure. It seems to me that CentOS would be perfect for him except for the need to keep it securely patched. I'm wondering if it's possible to auto-install

Folks have noticed that the documentation is semi-silent about how to properly encode the granule position and interleave synchronization of keyframe-based video. The primary reasons for this: a) we at Xiph hadn't had to do it yet b) there are several easy possibilities, and the longer we had to think about it before mandating One True Spec, the better that spec would likely be. The