search for: intellectually

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches for "intellectually".

Did you mean: intellectual
2004 Sep 25
0
G.729 and Asterisk intellectual property issues
-- snip -- Had the patch been against the actual g729 libraries the case would have been clear. Now, the patch is against asterisk to make it interoperate with the g729 libarary and this may or may not be non-infringing. However, the distribution of the g729 libraries themselves are almost certainly infringing. There is also the possibility that the patch to asterisk may be ruled a
2010 Nov 22
4
Novell sale news?
Is anyone following the news of the Novell sale and some mysterious 'intellectual property assets' that were transferred to a holding company controlled by Microsoft? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
2011 Jul 22
32
Shorewall 4.4.22 Beta 3
Beta 3 is now available for testing. Corrections in this release: 1) Corrections included in Shorewall 4.4.21.1. 2) Several problems reported by Steven Springl. The rest is largely cleanup of the new rule infrastructure. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \
2011 Jul 22
32
Shorewall 4.4.22 Beta 3
Beta 3 is now available for testing. Corrections in this release: 1) Corrections included in Shorewall 4.4.21.1. 2) Several problems reported by Steven Springl. The rest is largely cleanup of the new rule infrastructure. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \
2010 May 24
2
VP8
Patenting a mathematical formula is NOT creating a machine nor is it unique. For example. 2+2=4... apples + apples^2= given outcome. I want to patent this. It's stupid to patent something like that. The same is true for formula algorithms. Algorithms occur in nature. Thus should not be patented. Now, Volley G Mathison inventor of the Electropsychometer had a machine that he could patent. A
2007 Jan 08
3
5-beta or 4.4 for a new user?
Hello, I am a Slackware user who's interested in learning CentOS. At this point it is for intellectual curiosity only and not for any real work so the machine need not be 100% stable at this point. It's most probably going to be an installation into VMWare. Given that, I thought I'd wait for 5-beta (mid-Jan'07) and start with that. Will it be possible to upgrade from 5-beta
2013 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Emitting recursive types
Hi, I'm having a play with LLVM to implement a custom language (for my intellectual curiosity only). I'm wondering how, when using IRBuilder, one can can it to emit a recursive type definition? The code for TypeBuilder explicitly states that it doesn't handle recursive types... I'm after being able to emit, programmatically, stuff like the Named Types example in the Language
2005 Feb 16
3
LinuxWorld Expo Update
Well, the first day was interesting. We a variety of questions from why do we do this, what's going on with RH, how come this is the first I've heard of you. And hundreds more. The good thing is that we've recieve a very positive response from everyone that visited our booth. Such a positive response that all our CentOS CD's are gone, and most of the cAos CD's are gone, and
2015 Oct 07
2
authorship and citation
On 07/10/2015 1:39 PM, Tim Keitt wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com >> wrote: > >> Another example: The "Author" of the Ecdat package is Yves Croissant < >> yves.croissant at let.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr>. I'm the Maintainer. At some >> point, I may add my name to the list of Authors but I
2015 Oct 07
2
authorship and citation
An example from the sos package: Its DESCRIPTION file says Author: Spencer Graves, Sundar Dorai-Raj, and Romain Francois. However, the package includes a findFn function, whose help file includes an Author(s) section, which reads, "Spencer Graves, Sundar Dorai-Raj, Romain Francois. Duncan Murdoch suggested the "???" alias for "findFn" and contributed the code for
1997 May 02
0
R-beta: Re: S Compatibility
Ross Ihaka writes: > Peter Dalgaard writes: ************************ > > What he probably would tell you is that the FSF has a substantial "red > > tape" procedure for code contributions to ensure that nobody can claim > > to own parts of the code and thereby block the use of the entire > > product. You can't put code under GPL if you don't own it,
2001 Jun 26
3
Wow...Wondered when this was going to happen.
Have a look: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/19982.html Any predictions? Matt --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list
2015 Dec 17
2
Setting up PXE server
Folks On a lark, I am trying to set up a PXE server so I can use network boots to load new computers {some of which are virtual) at home. It's more of an intellectual exercise than a work necessity. I've read several "how to" documents, and even the one on the RedHat site doesn't help. (For example, it refers to /etc/xinet.d instead of /etc/xinetd.d, and the careless
1998 Jun 24
1
SPAM: Important Legislative Alert (fwd)
this has serious ramifications for the "nt domains for unix" project. luke. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 13:25:57 -0500 From: Simple Nomad <thegnome@NMRC.ORG> To: NTBUGTRAQ@LISTSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM Subject: SPAM: Important Legislative Alert June 23rd, 1998 - The World Intellectual Property Organization treaty has already passed the US Senate and is
2005 Jan 27
3
the incredible lightness of crossprod
The following is at least as much out of intellectual curiosity as for practical reasons. On reviewing some code written by novices to R, I came across: crossprod(x, y)[1,1] I thought, "That isn't a very S way of saying that, I wonder what the penalty is for using 'crossprod'." To my surprise the penalty was substantially negative. Handily the client had S-PLUS as
2004 Jun 18
3
TE410P / Eicon PRI
for today we only have experience with BRI applications together with asterisk. is the following scenario possible and stable enough for production? FYI : We want to build a unified messaging application integrated with SIP. We have an E1 connection in Belgium with 100 msn's We would think about having 2 servers : Server A : Asterisk PRI card (Digium TE410P) Server B : Fax
2005 Feb 24
2
survreg with gamma distribution: re-post
Dear r-help subscribers, A couple of weeks ago I sent the following message to the r-help mail list. It hasn't generated any response, and I could really use some help on this. Anyone able to help? Thanks again, Roger Dungan >> I am working on some survival analysis of some interval censored failure time data in R. I have done similar analysis before using PROC LIFEREG in SAS. In
2013 Apr 16
7
the joy of spreadsheets (off-topic)
Given that we occasionally run into problems with comparing Excel results to R results, and other spreadsheet-induced errors, I thought this might be of interest. http://www.nextnewdeal.net/rortybomb/researchers-finally-replicated-reinhart-rogoff-and-there-are-serious-problems The punchline: "If this error turns out to be an actual mistake Reinhart-Rogoff made, well, all I can hope is that
2005 Feb 09
1
Please share the experience on VoIP phones heavy using.
Hi there, Does someone can share the experience with Cisco and Polycom Phones? How rock solid are they? And who will win in sound quality contest? I heard that Cisco phones is a Polycom replicas with changed design. Is that true? What else phones is better to implement to the medium sized business? The rock solid stability and superb sound quality is a must. -- All the Best! Sergey.
2010 Sep 28
1
samba version to use on CentOS?
I see via yum that there is "samba" and there is "samba3x" available for CentOS (my boxes are hooked to the main CentOS repo, Fedora EPEL, and RPMFORGE). 'samba' is 3.0.33 'samba3x' is 3.3.8 Is there any down-side to upgrading to 'samba3x' and running 3.3.8 instead of 3.0.33? I'm assuming that, in general, I should be running the latest