search for: intec

I'm looking to do this same thing. Were you ever able to succeed in booting your disk-image via PXE? REF: http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2007-May/008447.html ========================== Bryan Keadle, MCNE / LPI1 / MCP Systems Engineer Village of Palatine 200 E. Wood St. Palatine, IL 60067 (847-963-6272 - Phone/Voice Mail ( 847-359-9040- Fax *bkeadle at palatine.il.us

...o ensure cruft is removed. OK, thanks. Your patch seems to work, although I also get the following unharmful warning (cf. http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/ show_bug.cgi?id=885): <unknown>: CommandLine Error: Argument 'verify' defined more than once! Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...please let me know One problem is that I have problems reading the raw partition 'dev/hda11' - I tried to 'dd' it but it failed... Regards Erik Haukj?r Andersen -- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be legally privileged and/or copyright material of Intec Telecom Systems PLC (or its affiliated companies). If you are not an intended or authorised recipient of this e-mail or have received it in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case, reading, reproducing, printing or further dissemination of this e-mail or...

...r.py However, at the destination the .. is missing. for example the link "../python/compile_plan.py" becomes "python/compile_plan.py" at the destination. Gary Aviv This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be legally privileged and/or copyright material of Intec Telecom Systems PLC (or its affiliated companies). If you are not an intended or authorised recipient of this e-mail or have received it in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case, reading, reproducing, printing or further dissemination of this e-mail or...

Hi, Op 20-aug-06, om 22:26 heeft Reid Spencer het volgende geschreven: > Do you have a verify option in your loaded module? What exactly do you mean by "verify option"? Anyway, I did a grep on "verify" in my code, but found nothing. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...;make ; make install" did the trick. After making necessary adjustments to my LLVM-app (due to disappearing of ConstantSInt and ConstantUInt, and replacement of RegisterOpt by RegisterPass), all its tests passed. Didn't check LLVM's test suite. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University

...ols available for future loaded libraries. Changing on line 64: void *H = dlopen(Filename, RTLD_LAZY); ... into ... void *H = dlopen(Filename, RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_GLOBAL); fixes this. Could this change be incorporated into future releases? Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...patch seems to work, although I also get the > following unharmful warning (cf. http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/ > show_bug.cgi?id=885): > > <unknown>: CommandLine Error: Argument 'verify' defined more than once! > > Kind regards, > > Bram Adams > GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium) > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

> When building LLVM 1.9 on OSX 10.4.8, I get (after a while, see attachment): > > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/path/to/llvm-build/Debug/bin/tblgen', > needed by `/path/to/llvm-build/lib/VMCore/Debug/Intrinsics.gen.tmp'. Stop. > make: *** [install] Error 1 > > when doing: > > $LLVM_SRC/configure --prefix=$LLVM_INSTALL --with-llvmgccdir=$LLVM_FRONT

...com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list at redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be legally privileged and/or copyright material of Intec Telecom Systems PLC (or its affiliated companies). If you are not an intended or authorised recipient of this e-mail or have received it in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case, reading, reproducing, printing or further dissemination of this e-mail or...

...d passes 1411 # of unexpected failures 140 # of expected failures 33 I also ran the comprehensive test suite, but I'm not sure how to get similar numerical results like the simple tests yield (I only get lots of textual traces). Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University

...a CallInst to the clone So, I wonder what problems may show up in this algorithm (steps 4, 5 and 6 seem to be crucial). The vararg-case could be a problem in step 5, although the va_start intrinsic isn't tied to the surrounding Function at first sight. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...% \ ... Only the solution to the second problem really seems to work, the other one is accepted by llvmc, but I also get: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols: _main collect2: ld returned 1 exit status llvmc: Action failed How can this library problem be solved? Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...st continues at position count and beyond, resulting in overflow. I'm not sure whether this code snippet is valid ANSI C, and if it is, one probably shouldn't use this approach, but I'm just curious to know how (and if) this problem could be solved. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...het volgende geschreven: > > > Do you have a verify option in your loaded module? > > What exactly do you mean by "verify option"? Anyway, I did a grep on > "verify" in my code, but found nothing. > > Kind regards, > > Bram Adams > GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium) > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

...o put them first, i.e. before all other optimizations (inlining, internalizing, ... should only kick in after my passes). Omitting AnalysisUsage::setPreservesAll() doesn't help and there is no AnalysisUsage::invalidateAll(). Does anybody know a workaround? Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

Hi, What's the best way to clone a Function (deep copy, not shallow)? Apparently only Instruction-classes feature a clone()-method, and there is no dedicated copy constructor/operator= for Function either. Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University

Hi, Op 26-mei-07, om 23:14 heeft Chris Lattner het volgende geschreven: > Shouldn't these symbols get "common" linkage, aka llvm weak linkage? > > Are you building the source with -fno-common? Yes. What does this mean? Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...with this in a self-contained .c file. Thanks! Has happened: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1482. > Very strange. Is everything up to date? Yes, I applied your patch but it still hangs on -O3, not on -O0 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1446). Kind regards, Bram Adams GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)

...64: > > void *H = dlopen(Filename, RTLD_LAZY); > > ... into ... > > void *H = dlopen(Filename, RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_GLOBAL); > > fixes this. Could this change be incorporated into future releases? > Thanks in advance! > > Kind regards, > > Bram Adams > GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium) > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/