search for: int_values

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "int_values".

2008 Mar 20
1
Use of Factors
...# fill the SubjID interp_out[,1]=SubjID; Now fill in interplated values for each visit. interp_out[1:9,4]=hrv1;interp_out[10:18,4]=hrv2; # hrv1 & hrv2 come from the following function, the "lm" parameter is output from the standard lm() function: interpolateToXL = function(lm,maxxl){ int_values=matrix(nrow=9,ncol=1) int_values[1,]=coef(lm)[1]; if (maxxl>25) int_values[2,]=coef(lm)[1]+coef(lm)[2] * 25 if (maxxl>50) int_values[3,]=coef(lm)[1]+coef(lm)[2] * 50 if (maxxl>75) int_values[4,]=coef(lm)[1]+coef(lm)[2] * 75 if (maxxl>100) int_values[5,]=coef(lm)[1]+coef(lm)[2] *...
2007 May 03
2
[patch] Mac Universal Binaries
On 5/3/07, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Peter Grayson wrote: > > Personally I think universal binaries are a bad idea. They have obviously served some purpose, but I tend to agree that the concept does not seem to scale well once outside the Apple microcosm. > For one of my projects, libsndfile, endian issues is not the only > think that breaks in
2007 May 03
0
[patch] Mac Universal Binaries
Peter Grayson wrote: > Can you elaborate on what kind of CPU vagaries come into play besides > endianess? One issue I found was the cpu behaviour when converting from float/double to int32 when the source float is outside the range of values that can be represented by the int32. For instance: float int32_ppc in32_x86 2147483649.0 2147483647 -2147483648
2007 May 03
2
[patch] Mac Universal Binaries
> One issue I found was the cpu behaviour when converting from > float/double to int32 when the source float is outside the range > of values that can be represented by the int32. > > For instance: > > float int32_ppc in32_x86 > 2147483649.0 2147483647 -2147483648 > 2147483648.0 2147483647 -2147483648 > 2147483647.0
2019 May 07
1
samba-tool max-pwd-age error
On Tue, 7 May 2019 17:06:24 +1200 Tim Beale <timbeale at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Apologies, this bug fell through the cracks and the fix never got > backported to 4.10. I've uploaded the backport to the bug now, it just > needs a review signoff. > > To recap, it was introduced as a side-effect of switching to Python 3. > The old code never worked as intended on