search for: int8_t

...orters for this approach, there wasn't a > consensus. To be fair, we didn't implement a complete prototype for this > idea nor did we conduct a thorough discussion. Do you have a link to this vector-based proposal? Suppose Clang currently lowers a parameter of type struct { int32_t, int8_t, int8_t, int8_t, int8_t } to i64, neither changing this to <8 x i8> or <2 * i32> seems correct - but perhaps one of those options is close enough for your requirements?. This is a disruptive change of course: there is an often under-specified contract between the frontend and target bac...

Martin.Rottler at nuernberger.de wrote: > I have problems compiling openssh-3-7-1p2 on Reliant UNIX. > (same problem with 3-7-1p1) > > first error was: > ../defines.h 144: [error] CFE1101 "int8_t" has already been declared in the > current scope > typedef char int8_t; The configure test tests for int8_t, int16_t and int32_t before defining HAVE_INTXX_T. Does your system define all three (possibly in /usr/include/sys/types.h)? > cc -o ssh ssh.o readconf.o clientloop....

...ch, there wasn't a >> consensus. To be fair, we didn't implement a complete prototype for this >> idea nor did we conduct a thorough discussion. > > Do you have a link to this vector-based proposal? Suppose Clang > currently lowers a parameter of type struct { int32_t, int8_t, int8_t, > int8_t, int8_t } to i64, neither changing this to <8 x i8> or <2 * > i32> seems correct - but perhaps one of those options is close enough > for your requirements?. This is a disruptive change of course: there > is an often under-specified contract between the fro...

> Dave Yeo wrote: >> Yes that makes sense. Requiring a C99 compliant compiler seems quite reasonable. > Well I'm actually going to be even more reasonable than that. The only bits of C99 that flac will really require is header file > with C99 standard width integers (int8_t, uint8_t, int16_t etc). Erik I would recommend including with the distribution a file for windows developers to use. It's fairly simple /* since windows doesn't have stdint.h */ typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t; typedef unsigned __int32 uint32_t; typedef unsigned __int16 uint16_t;...

...DataTypes.h) conflict with those used by other third-party libraries. Instead of these: #ifdef _MSC_VER typedef __int64 int64_t; typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t; typedef signed int int32_t; typedef unsigned int uint32_t; typedef short int16_t; typedef unsigned short uint16_t; typedef signed char int8_t; typedef unsigned char uint8_t; typedef signed int ssize_t; #endif it would be preferable to use these: typedef __int8 int8_t; typedef __int16 int16_t; typedef __int32 int32_t; typedef __int64 int64_t; typedef unsigned __int8 uint8_t; typedef unsigned __int16 uint16_t; typedef unsigned __int32 ui...

/klibc/klibc/include/bits32/bitsize/stdint.h:8: error: redefinition of `int8_t' /klibc/linux/include/linux/types.h:109: error: `int8_t' previously declared here The copy in stdint.h is not protected by: #ifndef __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__ #define __BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__ #endif /* !(__BIT_TYPES_DEFINED__) */ ===== Jon Smirl jonsmirl@yahoo.com ______________________________...

...Requiring a C99 compliant compiler >>>> seems quite >> reasonable. >>> Well I'm actually going to be even more reasonable than that. >>> The only >> bits of C99 that flac will really require is header file >>> with C99 standard width integers (int8_t, uint8_t, int16_t >>> etc). Erik >> >> I would recommend including with the distribution a file for >> windows developers to use. It's fairly simple >> >> >> /* since windows doesn't have stdint.h */ typedef unsigned >> __int64 uint64_t...

...it to one specific value of vscale. Also, I had a question about your table. Based on your description of how LMUL works, I’d expect that LMUL == vscale, and that each column in your table would be the same: int64_t | vscale x 1 x i64 int32_t | vscale x 2 x i32 int16_t | vscale x 4 x i16 int8_t | vscale x 8 x i8 … which is basically equivalent to: int64_t | LMUL x 1 x i64 int32_t | LMUL x 2 x i32 int16_t | LMUL x 4 x i16 int8_t | LMUL x 8 x i8 … is this not the case? Thanks, Chris Tetreault From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at li...

Hi, Let me give you my view of the status: The proposal you mentioned was, I believe, well understood and accepted. Except for one bit, which was that it requires correct typing of load/store operations. That is, if you load an i32, it means you are loading a single 32-bit integer, not two 16-bit integers or something else. This is a valid concern because currently nor LLVM nor clang

Hi, Back in 2016 an RFC titled "Killing Undef and Spreading Poison" [1] was posted on this mailing list, which generated a lot of discussion between different people. Later in 2017, a paper titled "Taming Undefined Behavior in LLVM" [2] was published, detailing the various concerns introduced in the RFC. There is also a patch proposal with an initial implementation

...// 1024 [10 x %int128m_T], // 1028 double, // 1192 double, // 1200 double, // 1208 i8, // 1216 double, // 1224 float // 1232 } The equivalent C struct: typedef struct { real32_T s; real_T d; int8_T i8[4]; uint16_T ui16[4]; int32_T i32[100]; uint64_T ui64[6]; int64_T i64[64]; char_T c[3]; creal_T mycomplex; int32_T enumeration_int32; int8_T enumeration_int8; uint16_T enumeration_uint16; cint32_T fixedpoint; int32_T fixedpoint2; int128m_T fimw[10]; real_T fisd1; real...

...LMUL = 4 LMUL = 8 int64_t | vscale x 1 x i64 | vscale x 2 x i64 | vscale x 4 x i64 | vscale x 8 x i64 int32_t | vscale x 2 x i32 | vscale x 4 x i32 | vscale x 8 x i32 | vscale x 16 x i32 int16_t | vscale x 4 x i16 | vscale x 8 x i16 | vscale x 16 x i16 | vscale x 32 x i16 int8_t | vscale x 8 x i8 | vscale x 16 x i8 | vscale x 32 x i8 | vscale x 64 x i8 We have another architecture parameter, ELEN, which means the maximum size of a single vector element in bits. We hope the type system could be consistent under ELEN = 32 and ELEN = 64. However, vscale may be a fractio...

...--- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_peephole.cpp @@ -932,6 +932,22 @@ ConstantFolding::opnd(Instruction *i, ImmediateValue &imm0, int s) Instruction *newi = i; switch (i->op) { + case OP_SPLIT: { + uint8_t size = typeSizeof(i->dType); + DataType type = typeOfSize(size / 2, isFloatType(i->dType), + isSignedType(i->dType)); + if (likely(type != TYPE_NONE)) { + uint64_t val = imm0.reg.data.u64; + uint16_t shift = size * 8; + bld....

...inux and BSD, I wouldn't > hold my breath on it lasting forever. I should say our existing code already has this bug, this patch doesn't change it :-) Below is V2 which fixes everything you mentioned. In this version I have got rid of long, unsigned_long, size_t and ssize_t, but added int8_t and uint8_t. Rich. >From 375e286be27f563a9f1a886e29bdcfcebebfa81c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 07:30:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] server: public: Add nbdkit_parse_* functions for safely parsing integers. MIME-Versi...

...n the LLVM IR. It might be interesting for static analysis tools that want to know if you truncate something that is too large for the target range but you need the sign to determine, e.g. the C/C++ frontend could use that flag for trunc of signed/unsigned integers, then you could e.g. check if (uint8_t)x changes the values if x has stuff out of the 0..255 range. e.g. x as int with -100 => trunc nuw to 8 => bad (int8_t)x => trunc nsw to 8 => ok Greetings Christoph > > Thanks, > Nuno > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Isoard via llvm-dev > Se...

...d parties to explore that and if we receive suggestions on how to generalize also in that respect, we'll certainly consider them. > 2. If you define a byte to be e.g. 16 bits wide, does it mean that > "char" is also 16 bits wide? If yes then how to do you define types > like int8_t from stdint.h? Yes, char is the same. The int8_t type is optional according to the standard and we don't define it for our OOT target. The int_least8_t is required, but we just define it to be byte sized. > 3. Have you thought about the possibility to support different byte > sizes for...

...n from Paul Hsieh's pstdint.h) */ #if (defined(__STDC__) && __STDC__ && __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) || (defined(__GNUC__) && (defined(_STDINT_H) || defined(_STDINT_H_)) || defined (HAVE_STDINT_H)) -#include <stdint.h> +# include <stdint.h> + typedef int8_t opus_int8; + typedef uint8_t opus_uint8; typedef int16_t opus_int16; typedef uint16_t opus_uint16; typedef int32_t opus_int32; typedef uint32_t opus_uint32; + typedef int64_t opus_int64; + typedef uint64_t opus_uint64; + #elif defined(_WIN32) # if defined(__CYGWIN__) -...

...uirements are equal or less strict. If all this is true, which testing shows on the x86_64 platform, then I can use zero-sized arrays to force the alignment of any structure element. I don't have to calculate the padding on my own (as does clang). For example, the C++ struct: struct pine { int8_t a; int8_t alignas(int32_t) b; }; Can become: type { i8, [0 x i32], i8 } -- edA-qa mort-ora-y Leaf Creator Leaf - the language we always wanted http://leaflang.org/

...Yeo wrote: >>> Yes that makes sense. Requiring a C99 compliant compiler seems quite > reasonable. >> Well I'm actually going to be even more reasonable than that. The only > bits of C99 that flac will really require is header file >> with C99 standard width integers (int8_t, uint8_t, int16_t etc). Erik > > I would recommend including with the distribution a file for windows > developers to use. It's fairly simple > > > /* since windows doesn't have stdint.h */ > typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t; > typedef unsigned __int32 uint32_t;...

...?6.5.3.4 alinea 3, When applied to an operand that has type char, unsigned char, or signed char, (or a qualified version thereof) the result is 1. On the other hand, unlike other basic integer types, the signedness of char is implementation-defined; see ?6.2.5 alinea 15 and footnote 35. Since int8_t is supposed to be a *signed* 8-bit integer, it must be explicitly defined as such. Code that relies on char being signed will break on IRIX, and probably a number of other implementations. DES -- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des at des.no -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment w...