search for: int64tofp

Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed though (see previous email). Sparc testing results: make check: # of expected passes 1189 # of expected failures 34 Regressions Single Source: None New Failures Single Source (new tests): 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit Regressions MultiSource: Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cb...

Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. >> If you'd like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. > > > I'll do minimal testing on Sparc. I'm not going to look into any > regressions though since no one has been really watching Sparc since I > graduated and I am sure there are

...ew one is built and ready to go. -- John T. > > Sparc testing results: > > make check: > # of expected passes 1189 > # of expected failures 34 > > Regressions Single Source: > None > > New Failures Single Source (new tests): > 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit > > Regressions MultiSource: > Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit > Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe > Be...

...0-13-SwitchTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-10-29-ScalarReplBug SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-02-02-NegativeZero SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-06-20-StaticBitfieldInit SingleSource/UnitTests/2004-11-28-GlobalBoolLayout SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13-SDivTwo SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-11-29-LongSwitch SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-29-SimpleIndirectCall SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-1...

...t;> >> Sparc testing results: >> >> make check: >> # of expected passes 1189 >> # of expected failures 34 >> >> Regressions Single Source: >> None >> >> New Failures Single Source (new tests): >> 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit >> >> Regressions MultiSource: >> Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit >> Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit >> Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit >> Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fo...

...ce/UnitTests/2002-08-19-CodegenBug | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-07-Compare64BitConstant | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/block-copied-in-cxxobj-1 | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-08-05-CastFPToUint...

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls | 0.0213 3084 0.0137 * 0.0131 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP | 0.0024 656 0.0042 * 0.0038 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13-SDivTwo | 0.0031 628 0.0029 * 0.0027...

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls | 0.0160 3092 0.0160 * 0.0160 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP | 0.0040 652 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13-SDivTwo | 0.0000 620 0.0080 * 0.0040...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls | 0.0161 3084 0.0170 * 0.0203 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP | 0.0029 644 0.0076 * 0.0035 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13-SDivTwo | 0.0034 612 0.0070 * 0.0026...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls | 0.0131 3188 0.0062 * * | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * * | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP | 0.0012 672 0.0016 * 0.0016 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13-SDivTwo | 0.0012 652 0.0014 * 0.0016...

...01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls                       | > 0.0100 2144     0.0200      *                0.0100      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP                              | > 0.0000 684      0.0100      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.00 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13-SDivTwo                                | > 0.0000 648      0.0000      *          ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs- > fls | 0.0100 2144 0.0200 > * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12- > Int64ToFP | 0.0000 684 0.0100 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.00 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-13- > SDivTwo | 0.0000 648 0.0000 &g...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...ll 1 1868 0 0.01 1859 0 0.01 1859 2004-08-12-InlinerAndAllocas.ll 2 4031 0 0.01 4019 0 0.01 4019 2004-11-28-GlobalBoolLayout.ll 1 3428 0 0.01 3419 0 0.01 3419 2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift.ll 1 1924 0 0.01 1912 0 0.01 1912 2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls.ll 6 13763 0 0.01 13754 0 0.01 13754 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP.ll 1 2468 0 0.01 2459 0 0.01 2459 2005-05-13-SDivTwo.ll 1 2235 0 0.01 2226 0 0.01 2226 2005-07-15-Bitfield-ABI.ll 2 2627 0 0.01 2618 0 0.01 2618 2005-07-17-INT-To-FP.ll 1 5565 0 0.01 5556 0 0.01 5556 2005-11-29-LongSwitch.ll 2 2562 0 0.01 2553 0 0.01 2553 2006-01-23-UnionInit.ll 4 15468 0 0.01 1545...