Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "int64_t93".
Did you mean:
int64_t
2008 Sep 12
3
[LLVMdev] CPP API User-level Question: Returning multiple values
...way the LLVM-GCC inserts instructions to generate AMD64 ABI compliant
code. I'm trying to create
ret i64 %mrv, double %double_mrv37
which is basically what LLVM-GCC puts out. However if I use lcc
-march=cpp to get the API code I need it has the following line:
ReturnInst::Create(int64_t93, label_return);
with no reference to the double. I also can't find anything in the
doxygen docs for a version of ReturnInst::Create( ) that takes two
values for returning, nor could I find anything by generating an
intentionally bad call and letting my gen-compiler list the possible
Return...
2008 Sep 12
0
[LLVMdev] CPP API User-level Question: Returning multiple values
...> code. I'm trying to create
>
> ret i64 %mrv, double %double_mrv37
This is LLVM 2.3 MRV syntax.
>
>
> which is basically what LLVM-GCC puts out. However if I use lcc
> -march=cpp to get the API code I need it has the following line:
>
> ReturnInst::Create(int64_t93, label_return);
>
> with no reference to the double. I also can't find anything in the
> doxygen docs for a version of ReturnInst::Create( ) that takes two
> values for returning, nor could I find anything by generating an
> intentionally bad call and letting my gen-compiler l...
2008 Sep 12
2
[LLVMdev] CPP API User-level Question: Returning multiple values
...> ret i64 %mrv, double %double_mrv37
>>
>
> This is LLVM 2.3 MRV syntax.
>
>
>> which is basically what LLVM-GCC puts out. However if I use lcc
>> -march=cpp to get the API code I need it has the following line:
>>
>> ReturnInst::Create(int64_t93, label_return);
>>
>> with no reference to the double. I also can't find anything in the
>> doxygen docs for a version of ReturnInst::Create( ) that takes two
>> values for returning, nor could I find anything by generating an
>> intentionally bad call and letti...
2008 Sep 12
0
[LLVMdev] CPP API User-level Question: Returning multiple values
...ble %double_mrv37
>>>
>>
>> This is LLVM 2.3 MRV syntax.
>>
>>
>>> which is basically what LLVM-GCC puts out. However if I use lcc
>>> -march=cpp to get the API code I need it has the following line:
>>>
>>> ReturnInst::Create(int64_t93, label_return);
>>>
>>> with no reference to the double. I also can't find anything in the
>>> doxygen docs for a version of ReturnInst::Create( ) that takes two
>>> values for returning, nor could I find anything by generating an
>>> intentionally...