search for: insurmountably

One question that keeps coming up in my discussions about ZFS is the lack of user quotas. Typically this comes from people who have many tens of thousands (30,000 - 100,000) of users where they feel that having a file system per user will not be manageable. I would agree that today that is the case however I personally don''t see this as an insurmountable problem. However the questions

Back in 2009 there was some discussion of the practicality of supporting char sizes greater than 8-bit: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2009-September/thread.html#6349 http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/thread.html#26025 with the consensus seemingly being "quite doable, please get a good patch and submit". However the current code appears (to my

My * is presently running fine on Mandrake 9.2, but Ive been entertaining moving to Mandrake 10.0 to enjoy the obvious improvement in kernal speed Im seeing on other 10.0 boxes Ive recently built for other applications. (10.0 is the first implementation of the 2.6 kernal) Any comments from anyone who's running on 10.0? IS anyone running * on Mandrake 10.0? If so, any issues stand out?

Hi just now I had an apparently insurmountable problem that's been bugging me for days, but phrasing my question in a form suitable for the R-help list enabled me to solve my own problem in two minutes flat. thanks everyone. -- Robin Hankin Uncertainty Analyst Southampton Oceanography Centre European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK tel 023-8059-7743

Does anyone on this list use pyst for AMI purposes? If so, can you point me in the direction of some simple examples. There seems to be none anywhere online. Probably doesn't help that I'm not that experienced at python but not insurmountably so. Thanks in Advance Ish -- Ishfaq Malik Department: VOIP Support Company: Packnet Limited t: +44 (0)845 004 4994 f: +44 (0)161 660 9825 e: ish at pack-net.co.uk w: http://www.pack-net.co.uk Registered Address: PACKNET LIMITED, Duplex 2, Ducie House 37 Ducie Street Manchester, M1 2JW COMPANY...

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 2015, at 8:02 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> > wrote: > > But it does look like we have a general issue here: Why is linux > special? If requiring a cmake that does't ship with a given system is > an issue at all, then we couldn't use any version of

Dear friends: I've been trying for some time to install my copy of Word97 (which I own, having purchased it directly from Microsoft with my own license number). I have tried the latest Wine 0.9.14. To do this, I first UNinstalled version 0. 9.1-4 (PCLINUXOS), then installed the new wine from source. The source install asked me to install a number of font files, which I did (bison,

Hello Tom, Sorry, please but i again return to IFB question. If i correct understand in current situation IFB haven't profit from ESFQ in common cases (i mean internal networks masquarading) so as we wait from ESFQ allocates bandwidth fairly per source IP(internal) but IFB don't know internal IPs. If i correct, what do you think what can help IFB to solve its main disadvantage

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:01:21PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard at eircom.net> wrote: > > Warren Young wrote: > > > > > >> No, I am making the assumption that the vast majority of CentOS installs > >> are racked up in datacenters, VPS hosts, etc. > > > > Is that true, I wonder? >

Chris Lattner wrote: > As others have mentioned, hacking the front-end isn't that hard. In > any case though, please be aware that a precompiled binary for a non- > MIPS target won't produce correct code if you are (for example) using > an x86 front-end and forcing llc to generate mips code with llc - > march=mips. The front-end does type layout and knows very ABI

Hello everybody, I''ve been using RSpec as a tool to create web applications for some time now, in Rails, and using plain Ruby with WEBrick as well. The tool suits my needs and the story runner is great. Now there are things that aren''t solvable on the web, you''ll need a _real_ desktop application for those problems. So I''ve toyed a bit around with various GUI

I have been using internal snapshots on production qcow2 images for a couple of years, admittedly as infrequently as possible with one exception and that exception has had multiple snapshots taken and removed using virt-manager's GUI. I was unaware of this: > There are some technical downsides to > internal snapshots IIUC, such as inability to free the space used by the > internal

Hi, I am dealing with the following problem. There are two biochemical assays, say A and B, available for analyzing blood samples. Half the samples have been analyzed with A. Now, for some insurmountable logistic reasons, we have to use B to analyze the remaining samples. However, we can do a comparative study on a small number of samples where we can obtain concentrations using both A and

Hi again, On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 19:25, Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> wrote: > I don't know that this ends up being easier to implement overall, but the model is closer to what the hardware actually supports, and it involves fewer changes to target-independent code. I've now got something about largely working via an IR-level lowering pass (pushed to GitHub as

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Davide Italiano via llvm-dev > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:55 AM > To: ramana.venkat83 at gmail.com; Cary Coutant > Cc: llvm-dev; LLDB > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [lldb-dev] [LLD] How to get rid of debug info of > sections deleted by garbage collector > >

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, stlport was a pain to deploy and maintain + it calls normal operator > new/delete (there is no way to put them into a separate namespace). > Ok, but putting the raw symbols into a "namespace" with the linker shouldn't be subject to these limitations. Note that in some

> It's definitely doable, but I'd be worried about the maintenance burden. Yes, that is a problem. We are currently not allowed to reveal our target (which has 16-bit bytes, and registers with non-power-of-two bit widths) fully, and therefore not able to submit it upstream. One idea we have toyed with is to create a simple "dummy" version of our target, just to be able

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > > Hi, >> >> Yes, stlport was a pain to deploy and maintain + it calls normal operator >> new/delete (there is no way to put them into a separate namespace). >> > > Ok, but putting the raw symbols into a "namespace" with the linker > shouldn't be subject to

I believe it would be possible to run a cmake command to generate a BUILD file, though I don't know if that would be easier to maintain on the LLVM side. Would definitely be happy to see direct support, though I was just trying to figure out what's needed to hack this together on my end. I guess my real question is what underlying commands are necessary to build all the source files

> > You could look at the cmake+ninja (or other build system) build and dump > the commands it executes (I think ninja produces a log, or can do so) which > should show you all the commands needed to build any part of LLVM. > There's a switch to dump all compiler commands as a JSON file: https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.12/variable/CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS.html On Wed,