Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "insular".
2006 May 03
1
BUG: opens all interfaces.
...lunteers who preen through bug reports for the ones that are truly
new and valid. They can request reporters to do further tests, and so on,
before actually contacting the first line developers. More bugs will
get reported more quickly, even if with a bit of redundancy, if you
remove the emotional insularity toward reporting; while the first-line
developers don't get overloaded, by using intermediaries.
BTW, building this on FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE resulted in several
complaints of the form:
(though, it built, and appears to work.)
checking net/if_tap.h usability... no
checking net/if_tap.h presen...
2019 Dec 02
3
[RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
...externally? But that I
think is more the exception than the rule & perhaps not worth including in
the general practices document. But if you've seen several instances of
this sort of issue that seem worth addressing through this mechanism -
yeah, I'd be OK with an encouragement to avoid insular project areas where
possible (especially where there's strong overlap) - seek
external/long-term contributor input especially on design documents and
early/foundational patches, and in general err on the side of seeking more
input from code owners than not. If you ask too often for trivial thin...
2007 Sep 04
11
returning(...) ?
The following construct is an ActiveSupport-ism:
returning(Foo.new) do |foo|
...
end
I don''t especially like it, since it''s both more verbose and less efficient
than the direct alternative:
foo = Foo.new
...
foo
It doesn''t occur many times in Merb, so does anyone agree with me that it
should be removed?
I tried doing this (patch attached) and I find
2019 Dec 03
2
[RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
...I
> think is more the exception than the rule & perhaps not worth including in
> the general practices document. But if you've seen several instances of
> this sort of issue that seem worth addressing through this mechanism -
> yeah, I'd be OK with an encouragement to avoid insular project areas where
> possible (especially where there's strong overlap) - seek
> external/long-term contributor input especially on design documents and
> early/foundational patches, and in general err on the side of seeking more
> input from code owners than not. If you ask too of...
2000 Dec 23
2
Vorbis press
...nowledge available
at sites such as UBL.com and AllMusic.com make it much easier for
newbies to get in the know and up to speed.
Exclusion is out, and everything else is in; the sooner people
let go of the idea of the exclusive contract, exclusive
distribution agreements, exclusionary formats, and insular music
scenes, the more they'll get out of this heady collision of music
and the Internet.
Eliot Van Buskirk, Senior Editor, CNET Music Center
http://Music.CNET.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/...
2019 Dec 02
5
[RFC] High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
Yeah, +1 that people from the same organization are sometimes the only ones
working on a certain feature/area. (certainly I'd expect some discussion
about the feature in general to be discussed outside that group if it's in
any way contentious - but some stuff's clear enough (I think I implemented
debug_types years ago, likely with only Eric's approval, both of us being
at Google