search for: instrut

Hello, I just started using the GlobalISel framework. Is there a way to emit all intermediate invariants from IRTranslator to Instrution-Selection in a single instruction? It will be really handy. I mean something like '-save-temps' in clang. Best regards, Kumail Ahmed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170220/d9f7ac36...

...st have a global flag basically forbidding or allowing any such fast math optimizations in the assembly, but I'm not actually sure everybody honors that without tesselation...) For 1/9: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com> 2/9 has a typo in the commit short log ("Instrutions"). FWIW surely on nv50 you could keep a single mad instruction for umad (sad maybe too?). (I'm actually wondering if the hw really can't do unfused float multiply+add as a single instruction but I know next to nothing about nvidia hw...) Roland Am 12.06.2017 um 12:42 schrieb Nic...

...n...) > > For 1/9: > Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com> I forgot to mention, could you add some bits in gallium docs (source/tgsi.rst) for this? Not sure where maybe under Modifiers or some such. Roland > > 2/9 has a typo in the commit short log ("Instrutions"). > > FWIW surely on nv50 you could keep a single mad instruction for umad > (sad maybe too?). (I'm actually wondering if the hw really can't do > unfused float multiply+add as a single instruction but I know next to > nothing about nvidia hw...) > > Roland...

...ficance of the contrasts, which is to say, compute the standard errors and apply them to coef(fit) in a meaningful way. The se.contrasts() function looks quite appealing, though it appears to require me to respecify the contrasts...in both a contrast.obj and a coef. It is not at all clear from the instrutions what contrast.obj is, especially given that I have already specified the contrasts and they are already represented in coef(fit). I may be missing something here. Could someone suggest a way to go from coef(fit) to a table like summary(fit) which tests the single-df contrasts (and interactions...

...body have an idea why I'm getting the error below when using llc with arguments -O1 -disable-cgp? Note that this error is not given when using llc -O0. (I'd like to mention also I'm using custom Instruction selection for BUILD_VECTOR, which gets converted in my back end's machine instrution VLOAD_D, although the custom code seems to always select instructions in a valid way.) ******** Pre-regalloc Machine LICM: Test ******** Entering BB#4 Hoist non-reg-pressure: %vreg50<def> = VLOAD_D 1; MSA128D:%vreg50 dbg:IfVectorize.c:37:16 Hoisting %vreg50<def>...

...of you has a better idea? Sent a suggestion, as well as comments on patches 4 & 5. Patches 1 & 2: Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haehnle at amd.com> > > Karol Herbst (9): > tgsi: add precise flag to tgsi_instruction > tgsi/dump: print _PRECISE modifier on Instrutions > st/glsl_to_tgsi: handle precise modifier > tgsi: populate precise > tgsi/text: parse _PRECISE modifier > nv50/ir: add precise field to Instruction > nv50/ir/tgsi: handle precise for most ALU instructions > nv50/ir: disable mul+add to mad for precise instruc...

Hello, samba. ------------------------------ fault virtual address = 0x8 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instrution pointer = 0x8:0xc02081fa stack pointer = 0x10:0xcd369c6c frame pointer = 0x10:0xcd369cc0 ------------------------------ then my system is reboot.... My Server ->FreeBSD 5.1 Samba -> 3.0.3 client -> XP What's my problem solve ? -- Have a nice day, Ivan

Hi, Can any llvm pass change simple return branch into select/return pair? For example: define i10 @mod_N(i10 zeroext %a) zeroext { entry: %tmp2 = icmp ugt i10 %a, -400 ; <i1> [#uses=1] br i1 %tmp2, label %cond_true, label %return cond_true: ; preds = %entry %tmp5 = add i10 %a, 400 ; <i10> [#uses=1] ret i10 %tmp5 return: ; preds = %entry ret

lucefe wrote: > I did a simple test just now, but I alse failed. > > I delete several ordered instructions from end to begin, > but after deleting the first instruction(the last instruction of F), > the program crashed. > My test code is below (F is a function only containing several > sequential instructions): > > for (inst_iterator inst == --inst_end(F); inst !=

I did a simple test just now, but I alse failed. I delete several ordered instructions from end to begin, but after deleting the first instruction(the last instruction of F), the program crashed. My test code is below (F is a function only containing several sequential instructions): for (inst_iterator inst == --inst_end(F); inst != inst_begin(F); --inst) { Instruction * i = &*inst;

Does Centos/RHEL 4.4 supports the CERC 6-Channel SATA RAID Controller that comes with the Dell PowerEdge 830 Tower Server? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama, Republica de Panama Cel Panama. +(507) 6694-4780 ------------------------------------------------------------

...the on-line web-based application is available for Summer 2004 applications at: https://www-s2.aits.uillinois.edu/uidirect/GradStudies.html A new web-based application to be used for Fall 2004 and beyond has just become available. To begin the process go to the following website and follow the instrutions: http://www.oar.uiuc.edu/prospective/grad/gradBannerapp.html A paper application form can still be used and is available to download from the Graduate College's web site at (however, this is not the preferred method): http://www.grad.uiuc.edu/general/application.html The application...

...glsl_to_tgsi_visitor to apply the precise flag on instruction emited in ir_assignment->rhs->accept(); but I found no other easy way to handle this. Maybe somebody of you has a better idea? Karol Herbst (9): tgsi: add precise flag to tgsi_instruction tgsi/dump: print _PRECISE modifier on Instrutions st/glsl_to_tgsi: handle precise modifier tgsi: populate precise tgsi/text: parse _PRECISE modifier nv50/ir: add precise field to Instruction nv50/ir/tgsi: handle precise for most ALU instructions nv50/ir: disable mul+add to mad for precise instructions nv50/ir/tgsi: split mad to m...

Hello Matthias, On 28 July 2017 at 04:13, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > It's not that hard in principle: > - A register class is a set of registers. > - Virtual Registers have a register class assigned. > - If you have register constraints (like x86 8bit operations only work on > al,ah,etc.) then you have to create a new register class to express that.

Hi. Thank you for comments on asm code paravirtualization. Its direction is getting clear. Although it hasn't been finished yet, I'd like to start discussion on ia64 intrinsics paravirtualization. This patch set is just for discussion so that it is a subset of xen Linux/ia64 domU paravirtualization, not self complete. You can get the full patched tree by typing git clone

Hi. Thank you for comments on asm code paravirtualization. Its direction is getting clear. Although it hasn't been finished yet, I'd like to start discussion on ia64 intrinsics paravirtualization. This patch set is just for discussion so that it is a subset of xen Linux/ia64 domU paravirtualization, not self complete. You can get the full patched tree by typing git clone

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it