Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "instruction_list_end".
2008 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Custom Opcodes versus built-in opcodes
...}
> return DAG.getNode(Opc, MVT::Other, Chain, Dest,
> DAG.getConstant(SPCC, MVT::i32), CompareFlag);
Actually, I'm wrong, sorry about that. It looks like the encoding is
in the definition of the enum:
enum {
FIRST_NUMBER = ISD::BUILTIN_OP_END+SP::INSTRUCTION_LIST_END,
CMPICC, // Compare two GPR operands, set icc.
CMPFCC, // Compare two FP operands, set fcc.
BRICC, // Branch to dest on icc condition
BRFCC, // Branch to dest on fcc condition
...
Are your "targetISD" enums properly defined with the offse...
2008 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Custom Opcodes versus built-in opcodes
________________________________
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
On Behalf Of Chris Lattner
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 10:49 AM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Custom Opcodes versus built-in opcodes
On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Villmow, Micah wrote:
I am using lowering instructions and using custom opcodes that