Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "instructiions".
Did you mean:
instructions
2019 Mar 11
3
CPAN not working, or is it?
On Monday 11 March 2019 16:42:21 Pete Biggs wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm not expert on these things - I tend to do the naughty
> thing of using CPAN to install in system locations!
Hi Peter,
Do you have any instructiions on how to do this? I realise it's far from
ideal, but I need to get this system working, and can do it on a stand alone
server.
>
> But I think the .spec file generated, or the variables used for the
>
>
> it is trying to package ..../usr/share/
>
> I think you need the...
2019 Mar 12
0
CPAN not working, or is it?
On 3/11/19 9:53 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Monday 11 March 2019 16:42:21 Pete Biggs wrote:
>> I'm afraid I'm not expert on these things - I tend to do the naughty
>> thing of using CPAN to install in system locations!
> Hi Peter,
>
> Do you have any instructiions on how to do this? I realise it's far from
> ideal, but I need to get this system working, and can do it on a stand alone
> server.
>
>> But I think the .spec file generated, or the variables used for the
>>
>>
>> it is trying to package ..../usr/share/
>>...
2019 Mar 11
2
CPAN not working, or is it?
On Monday 11 March 2019 14:28:38 Pete Biggs wrote:
> > However, as I went for bigger modules, anything that had dependences
> > were then failing as the dependencie were installed OK but then did not
> > appear to be available.
> A number of things you can do. The sort of recommended way is to
> package the perl modules into an RPM and install them that way (so that
>
2008 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] Really nasty remat bug [LONG]
Ok, I've been tracking down a remat bug for over a week. I think I finally
understand what is going on. This happens in specfp2006 leslie3d
compiled with our frontend and optimizer. Unfortunately, getting a testcase
is going to be impossible due to restrictions on SPEC redistribution and
the complexity of the sequence of events leading to the bug.
The bug is extremely subtle and nasty.
2004 Sep 15
15
re: start error
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The original post was over 300,000kb so I didn''t spam the list with it -TE.
|
|
| Thank you for your quick and helpful response.
|
| I didn''t understand that the virtual interface eth0:1 doesn''t count as
a separate instance from eth0.
| I am sorry to ask for further assistance and would appreciate any
help. The error