search for: instruc

The intrinsic instructions always have an number in the end, what's meaning of it? For example, %2 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse2.sqrt.pd(<2 x double> %1) #2 What does this #2 mean? Can I ignore it when I create the instruction? Thanks. Best, Zhi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML a...

...aths). This part of code was working perfectly before of changing the algorithm to traverse the loop only once. However, the traverse algorithm should be totally independent to the part of the code where I add metadata. The single influence that I see is that I have to add more metadata operands to instructions. I mention that for each metadata operand I add a path = an integer identifier. When this was working, I used to add up to 17 metadata operands, now I have up to 72. How do I add metadata: Inside a* *loop iterating through basic blocks, for each basic block I take a particular instruction on...

...code was working perfectly before of changing the > algorithm to traverse the loop only once. However, the traverse algorithm > should be totally independent to the part of the code where I add metadata. > The single influence that I see is that I have to add more metadata > operands to instructions. I mention that for each metadata operand I add a > path = an integer identifier. When this was working, I used to add up to 17 > metadata operands, now I have up to 72. > > How do I add metadata: Inside a* *loop iterating through basic blocks, > for each basic block I take a pa...

...perfectly before of changing the >> algorithm to traverse the loop only once. However, the traverse algorithm >> should be totally independent to the part of the code where I add metadata. >> The single influence that I see is that I have to add more metadata >> operands to instructions. I mention that for each metadata operand I add a >> path = an integer identifier. When this was working, I used to add up to 17 >> metadata operands, now I have up to 72. >> >> How do I add metadata: Inside a* *loop iterating through basic blocks, >> for each bas...

...onezilla_live_testing). This Clonezilla Live version uses Syslinux >6.03-pre1. >... >Please avoid using any dd' method at this time... >... >... Please, at this time use the manual method ... Alright, I have done exactly as you've asked, and I have meticulously followed the instructions on the Clonezilla web site for "manual" install to the letter. Unfortunately, regardless of whether I perform Step #4 (i.e. running the "makeboot.bat" script) while logged in as a user with Admin privs, or under an ordinary user account... the instructions on the web site...

...eate them. I do not hack or diddle these tools that I have mentioned... Clonezilla, UBCD, or even OpenELEC (yet)... in any way. I just download the latest images that are meant for installing on a USB flash drive, and then I just dd them to my USB flash drives, or do whatever the standard install instructions tell me to do. I am not attempting to be clever. I'm just doing exactly the same things that everybody else... the great unwashed masses... are doing with these tools.... just ploping them onto USB sticks and NOT customizing them at all. And as I say, they all work great *except* whn I&...

This patch series implements SMP boot for arch/arm, as far as getting all CPUs up and running the idle loop. Changes from v1: - moved barriers out of loop in udelay() - dropped broken GIC change in favour of explanatory comment - made the increment of ready_cpus atomic (I couldn''t move the increment to before signalling the next CPU because the PT switch has to happen between