Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "instrselectionsupport".
2002 Sep 17
1
[LLVMdev] Compile error in InstrSelectionSupport.cpp
ISSUE: line 474 of InstrSelectionSupport.cpp is a conditional expression
of the form (<expr> ? (ConstantSInt*) : (ConstantUInt*)), which is an
unholy mixture of pointer types.
ACTION: Apply static_cast<Value*> to the two pointers, as the source
intends.
--
Casey Carter
Casey at Carter.net
ccarter at uiuc.edu
AIM: cartec6...
2002 Sep 13
2
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
ISSUE: INT64_MAX undefined in InstrSelectionSupport.cpp and
InstructionCombining.cpp. I'm not completely sure where INT64_MAX comes
from on Solaris, but C99 says that INT64_MAX is defined in stdint.h,
but, for C++, only if __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS is #defined. Solaris (at
least in CSIL) unfortunately does not have stdint.h, but it does have
th...
2002 Sep 13
0
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
> ISSUE: INT64_MAX undefined in InstrSelectionSupport.cpp and
> InstructionCombining.cpp. I'm not completely sure where INT64_MAX comes
> from on Solaris, but C99 says that INT64_MAX is defined in stdint.h,
> but, for C++, only if __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS is #defined. Solaris (at
> least in CSIL) unfortunately does not have stdint.h, but...
2002 Sep 13
3
[LLVMdev] Linux-x86 Compatability
Chris Lattner wrote:
>>ISSUE: INT64_MAX undefined in InstrSelectionSupport.cpp and
>>InstructionCombining.cpp. I'm not completely sure where INT64_MAX comes
>>from on Solaris, but C99 says that INT64_MAX is defined in stdint.h,
>>but, for C++, only if __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS is #defined. Solaris (at
>>least in CSIL) unfortunately does not have st...