search for: instnace

Ok, another explanation. In my runtime that uses LLVM as JIT engine, I have an instnace of GlobalVariable. The program I run in it writes some value to this variable. How can I read it? 2011/5/18 Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>: > Hi, > >> I need to define the global variable which would be modified by JITted >> code. Can I read it from the JITter itself? I...

I have just started with Ruby and Rails and am still greatly confuse, finding the usual tutorials not much help. What I want to do is take two numbers from my database, multiply them together and display them in a list with a comma for the thousands separator. This would be very easy to do in a spreadsheet, so I assumed it would be easy to do in Ruby on Rails but I can''t work out how. I

Hello, everyone! I need to define the global variable which would be modified by JITted code. Can I read it from the JITter itself? It is of pointer type. Best regards, Milovanov Victor.

Hi, > I need to define the global variable which would be modified by JITted > code. Can I read it from the JITter itself? It is of pointer type. I'm not sure what you are asking, can you please be more explicit/detailed. Ciao, Duncan.

Hello, I am new in this group. Please give me a short hint, in case this is the wrong place for my posting. I want to create an XML file and store it in "filetransfer". The XML part of the file (the body) sould go to "filetransfer.data". Despite the last line, everything is fine with the code below. With "filetransfer.save" two entries "<clone/>"

I''m totally baffled by the relation between objects and the session and when an object is still available. It seems to me that there should be a simple session.rb file (like the session.java file in WebObjects). Right now, I''m just trying to figure out how to keep an object around, say a User object, without saving it to the db, so that I can tell at any point whether the

> thanks for your reply. Sorry for the delay, I've been buried in email lately. >>> When translating a complex c application to llvm bytecodes, some >>> semantics are lost: >>> >> LLVM 1.6 and the "new front-end" already handle this right. Here's the >> bugzilla bug corresponding to it: >>

hi Chris! thanks for your reply. First of all I did not know about the history with the Annotation stuff. Annotable for me was a way how one could realize this things. So as I see it right now - it is more that Annotable will completly vanish soon. This is interesting to me. Chris Lattner schrieb: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Jakob Praher wrote: > >> When translating a complex c