search for: instanciated

The short version: When I port our application from LLVM 7 to 8, some JIT-compiled code seems to break the implicit instanciation of C++ templates. That is, when I try to resolve a symbol defined by the code, I get undefined symbols corresponding to methods that are actually function templates. If the code adds explicit template instanciations, the problem goes away. Does anybody have an

Well, I agree the front end must be responsible for (not) instantiating the function templates. However the problem shows up only when JIT compiling, for some reason, and only with LLVM 8. Is there perhaps something else that needs to be done before resolving symbols, in addition to running constructors, to ensure that instantiated function templates are taken into account? Or perhaps there is

Hi! I have 3 models, User, Company and Address. Basically, a User belongs to a Company and an Address has one Company (because it can be linked to other models). In a form I want to display a User, its Company and its company Address, with fields_for. The problem is when my User has a Company, that does *not* have an Address: the part containing the Address is not displayed. I see 2 ways of

I have found the cause of our problems with implicit template instantiation, and it looks to me like a bug in Orc JIT in LLVM 8. (Perhaps Lang could confirm?) We use createLegacyLookupResolver() to create our symbol resolver, passing it a lookup function. Amongst other things, our function calls LegacyRTDyldObjectLinkingLayer::findSymbol() to look up symbols in the JIT. When a module is

Have an instance of nvkm_falcon in the PMU structure, ready to be used by other subdevs (i.e. secboot). Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/pmu.h | 2 ++ drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/base.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/pmu.h

Hi there, I saw several Scriptaculous''s Effect examples and all of them makes the Effect instance at the time they want to apply to some page element. I need to make that in two phases, A) create instance of the effects associated to the affected elements and B) at any time execute the effect over the respective element. The executions of the effects will be dictated by events that

Generic framebuffer emulation uses a shadow buffer for framebuffers with dirty() function. If drivers want to use the shadow FB without such a function, they can now set prefer_shadow or prefer_shadow_fbdev in their mode_config structures. The former flag is exported to userspace, the latter flag is fbdev-only. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> ---

No, the problem is that Finalized is true. It is set to true at the start of the finalize() method. That's why I added a test causing that line to be executed if the symbol's address is zero... On Tue, 17 Sep 2019, 00:05 Lang Hames, <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > Oof. I don't know what this is yet, but I bet it's going to be awful. > Quick apology

Hi Am 07.07.19 um 16:37 schrieb Noralf Tr?nnes: > > > Den 05.07.2019 11.26, skrev Thomas Zimmermann: >> Generic framebuffer emulation uses a shadow buffer for framebuffers with >> dirty() function. If drivers want to use the shadow FB without such a >> function, they can now set prefer_shadow or prefer_shadow_fbdev in their >> mode_config structures. The former

Is it true that Rails needs a single column to uniquely identify a row in table? If yes, doesn''t this limit the database design and disables the use of Rails for legacy databases? /Fredrik -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...lass User < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :country, :foreign_key => "CountryId" set_primary_key "userId" end and class Country < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :user set_primary_key "countryId" end but when I inspect my user class after it has been instanciated, I get this: inspect: #<User:0x4062a68 @attributes={"userName"=>"sese daxnebwow", "CountryId"=>"216", "userId"=>"122", "userIP"=>"127.0.0.1"}> And then I get this in my page: ActionView::TemplateErr...

I'm replying to a very old thread (9 years ago) here http://grokbase.com/t/xapian/xapian-discuss/072tprmr6h/php5-query-parsing-bug So not sure if that's going to end up being more or less readable... I have this error : Fatal error: No matching function for overloaded 'new_Query' in /usr/share/php/xapian.php on line 2607 Line 2607 (and surrounding) looks like this and are in

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> wrote: > The IOMMU physical translation bit might vary with different SoCs. So add > a variable to specify this bit for GK20A. > > Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com> > --- > drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.h | 1 + > 2 files

Den 05.07.2019 11.26, skrev Thomas Zimmermann: > Generic framebuffer emulation uses a shadow buffer for framebuffers with > dirty() function. If drivers want to use the shadow FB without such a > function, they can now set prefer_shadow or prefer_shadow_fbdev in their > mode_config structures. The former flag is exported to userspace, the latter > flag is fbdev-only. > >

Den 05.07.2019 11.26, skrev Thomas Zimmermann: > Generic framebuffer emulation uses a shadow buffer for framebuffers with > dirty() function. If drivers want to use the shadow FB without such a > function, they can now set prefer_shadow or prefer_shadow_fbdev in their > mode_config structures. The former flag is exported to userspace, the latter > flag is fbdev-only. > >

Hello All, I am getting confused with best practices. I posted a topic earlier but realized how confusing it was. Thus I will do my best to be as clear as possible. I am a bit confused on best practice for instanciate a variable that will be used accross several methods within the same controller. I need this because of AJAX, here is a description of what I intend to do: (all this in done

...sorry for the spam, but answers I get to my previous question suggest that I should specify that the machine has a *lot* of memory and should be able to the instanciation... Anybody with an IBM mainframe, R-1.6.2 and large matrices ? L.

Hi, I experience a very strange behaviour when trying to instanciate a S4 class. A call like 'r <- new("MyClass", foo="bar")' returns apparently cleanly, but in fact a subsequent use of 'r' results in a 'r does not exist error message'. After a bit of hunting with 'debug', it seems that the bug is in 'initialize' (or one of the

hello all Im new to ruby and im just trying to see how i can instanciate an object that is defined in a class file like myclass.rb then in another file like start.rb i just call it like so newObj = myclass.new do i need the include statement at the top? like include myclass.rb or mayby the require statement? Thanks -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

In a rails script (something in the "script" dir with the good require) I added many document (around 4000) to an index globaly instanciate (and build if not present) in config/environment.rb. I ran 3 three times my script (I deleted my index every time before), and only the third was successful. That was STRANGE ! :) These are the errors :