search for: install_path

...'; ?FLUSH PRIVILEGES; quit I applied a small patch personal // application constants define('RCMAIL_VERSION', '0.1.1'); define('RCMAIL_CHARSET', 'UTF-8'); define('JS_OBJECT_NAME', 'rcmail'); // define global vars $OUTPUT_TYPE = 'html'; $INSTALL_PATH = dirname(__FILE__); $MAIN_TASKS = array('mail','settings','addressbook','logout'); if (empty($INSTALL_PATH)) ? $INSTALL_PATH = './'; else ? $INSTALL_PATH .= '/'; //This is the little patch that clears the session cookie if ( isset($_COOKIE['ses...

Here's a partially implemented fix for RHBZ#859949. Seeing as this is my first libguestfs patch, I'd like some other eyeballs on it to make sure I've not done anything completely crazy. If the rpm case looks ok, I'll update the deb and windows cases if/where applicable.

...development packages of Xlib/Xfree86 at the very least. > > Use the --without-x option if you really want this. > > make: *** No rule to make target `depend'. Stop. > > make: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop. > > Done installing, wine is now located in ${INSTALL_PATH}. > > > > Any clues to what's causing this? > > > > > > Do you have the X windows development package installed? > > John John, I have x11-proto-devel & x11-server-devel installed Are there more? Jim

Hi, I'm try to build llvm on my PC but it failed. I'm using following command, $ cmake -G "Ninja" ../llvm -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=prefix=$INSTALL_PATH -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On $ ninja-build -j 2 I have skipped libcxx and libcxxabi package. It shows below error, 00:04:23 [3261/3430] Building CXX object tools/clang/tools/libclang/CMakeFiles/libclang.dir/CIndexCXX.cpp.o 00:04:30 [3262/3430] Building CXX object tools...

...uot; directory definitely gets created first >as there is a rule for it in Makefile.rules and appropriate >dependencies. Also, the error message seems to indicate that "install" >wants to create a directory, not create a file as it should. There's no >such directory as <install_path>/bin/llvm-ar ! Ah, I see. What I am getting is lli as lli without the .exe, same for everything except llvm-ranlib and llvm-ar which both are directories with .exe files in them ! Maybe I should look at the makefile and/or possibly use the same version of install.sh as you are using ??? Th...

...stfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); -static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *version, const char *release, const char *arch, const char *install_path, const char *publisher, const char *url, const char *description); +static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *version, const char *release, const char *arch, const char *install_path, const c...

...x-2.6.12-xen0/localversion-xen 6. diff -Naur linux-2.6.12 linux-2.6.12-xen0 > archive/linux-2.6.12-xen0.patch 7. cd linux-2.6.12 8. patch -p1 < ../archive/linux-2.6.12-xen0.patch 9. cd ../ 10. mkdir install 11. cd linux-2.6.12-xen0 12. cp arch/xen/configs/xen0_defconfig .config 13. ARCH=xen; INSTALL_PATH=../install; INSTALL_MOD_PATH=../install 14. export ARCH INSTALL_PATH INSTALL_MOD_PATH 15. make oldconfig 16. make menuconfig 17. make modules But I get an error: CHK include/linux/version.h CC arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s In file included from include/asm-xen/asm/processor.h:18,...

...t; ]; then + cover -delete + HARNESS_PERL_SWITCHES=-MDevel::Cover ./Build test + cover + mkdir blib/coverage + cp -a cover_db/*.html cover_db/*.css blib/coverage + mv blib/coverage/coverage.html blib/coverage/index.html + else + ./Build test + fi +fi + +./Build install \ + --install_path locale=$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT/share/locale \ + --install_path confdoc=$AUTOBUILD_INSTALL_ROOT/share/man/man5 + +rm -f $NAME-*.tar.gz +./Build dist + +if [ -f /usr/bin/rpmbuild ]; then + if [ -n "$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" ]; then + EXTRA_RELEASE=".auto$AUTOBUILD_COUNTER" + else...

Here's the new API method and update to virt-inspector. I still need to implement app_arch for debian and windows (if applicable), for now they just return empty strings.

...stfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); -static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *version, const char *release, const char *arch, const char *install_path, const char *publisher, const char *url, const char *description); +static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *version, const char *release, const char *arch, const char *install_path, const c...

...what you want. You will need to install development packages of Xlib/Xfree86 at the very least. Use the --without-x option if you really want this. make: *** No rule to make target `depend'. Stop. make: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop. Done installing, wine is now located in ${INSTALL_PATH}. Any clues to what's causing this? Jim Zac Brown wrote: > Hi Steve, > > You can find the script for PCLinuxOS 2007 at > http://labs.zacbrown.org/doku.php?id=winesourcebuildscripts. > > Instructions are on the page as to how to run it. It will require some user > in...

...The "bin" directory definitely gets created first as there is a rule for it in Makefile.rules and appropriate dependencies. Also, the error message seems to indicate that "install" wants to create a directory, not create a file as it should. There's no such directory as <install_path>/bin/llvm-ar ! Reid. On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 20:49 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: > Reid, > > I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !? > > Not sure but that would seem logical. > > Aaron > > > _______________________________________________ &g...

Here's the new API method and update to virt-inspector. I still need to implement app_arch for debian and windows (if applicable), for now they just return empty strings. New in v2: incorporated feedback from v1, also added patch #3 which updates the documentation where it references the deprecated API. Take it or leave it.

...itely gets created first > >as there is a rule for it in Makefile.rules and appropriate > >dependencies. Also, the error message seems to indicate that "install" > >wants to create a directory, not create a file as it should. There's no > >such directory as <install_path>/bin/llvm-ar ! > > Ah, I see. What I am getting is lli as lli without the .exe, same for > everything except llvm-ranlib and llvm-ar which both are directories with > .exe files in them ! > > Maybe I should look at the makefile and/or possibly use the same version of >...

>>> When building Samba 4.4.0rc and then doing an install to >>> /usr/local/samba, a directory "libexec" is being created which then >>> contains a "samba" directory with a single "smbspool_krb5_wrapper" >>> file inside (/usr/local/samba/libexec/samba/ >>> smbspool_krb5_wrapper). This is not very clean, is it? >>>

..._install INSTALL arch/x86/kernel/test_nx.ko INSTALL drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.ko DEPMOD 2.6.27.5-xen make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/xen-3.3.1/build-linux-2.6.27-xen_x86_64'' make -C build-linux-2.6.27-xen_x86_64 ARCH=$(sh buildconfigs/select-linux-arch linux-2.6.27-xen.hg) INSTALL_PATH=/usr/src/xen-3.3.1/dist/install vmlinuz select-linux-arch: x86 make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/xen-3.3.1/build-linux-2.6.27-xen_x86_64'' make -C /usr/src/linux-2.6.27-xen.hg O=/usr/src/xen-3.3.1/build-linux-2.6.27-xen_x86_64/. vmlinuz make[6]: Nothing to be done for `vmlinuz'...

...stfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *version, const char *release, const char *arch, const char *install_path, const char *publisher, const char *url, const char *description); static void sort_applications (struct guestfs_application2_list *); @@ -145,6 +146,11 @@ guestfs__inspect_list_applications2 (guestfs_h *g, const char *root) break; case OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_PACMAN: + ret = list_appl...

Hi, I have a question about: /sbin/installkernel I believe this line: LINK_PATH=/boot and usage of this variable... is a bug. What do others say? Using this script, as-is, I would need to chroot to make it work properly for a alternative INSTALL_PATH, right? who the heck is tyson? why did he re-write this? # # /sbin/installkernel - written by tyson at rwii.com # Cheers, AZ

...stfs_application2_list *list_applications_windows (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs); static void add_application (guestfs_h *g, struct guestfs_application2_list *, const char *name, const char *display_name, int32_t epoch, const char *version, const char *release, const char *arch, const char *install_path, const char *publisher, const char *url, const char *description); static void sort_applications (struct guestfs_application2_list *); @@ -140,6 +141,11 @@ guestfs_impl_inspect_list_applications2 (guestfs_h *g, const char *root) break; case OS_PACKAGE_FORMAT_APK: + ret = list_app...

...lue (g, child, "DisplayVersion"); if (value) - version = guestfs_hivex_value_utf8 (g, value); + version = guestfs_hivex_value_string (g, value); value = guestfs_hivex_node_get_value (g, child, "InstallLocation"); if (value) - install_path = guestfs_hivex_value_utf8 (g, value); + install_path = guestfs_hivex_value_string (g, value); value = guestfs_hivex_node_get_value (g, child, "Publisher"); if (value) - publisher = guestfs_hivex_value_utf8 (g, value); + publisher = guestfs_hiv...