Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "install_ldt_entri".
Did you mean:
install_ldt_entry
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 12/12] xen-ldt
Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 15:27:26.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 21:13:19.000000000 -0700
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/ldt.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>
+#include
2007 Apr 18
0
[PATCH 12/12] xen-ldt
Index: linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 15:27:26.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.13/arch/i386/kernel/ldt.c 2005-08-08 21:13:19.000000000 -0700
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <asm/system.h>
#include <asm/ldt.h>
#include <asm/desc.h>
+#include
2007 Apr 18
1
Descriptor table patches integrated
I've integrated patches from Chris and Martin into the -mm tree. I'll
be sending out the patches shortly after testing with my (still in
progress!) Linux LDT test suite.
First interface quirk came up. It looks like Xen wants to return errors
from hypercalls:
+static inline int install_ldt_entry (__u32 *lp, __u32 entry_1, __u32 entry_2)
+{
+ unsigned long mach_lp =
2007 Apr 18
1
Descriptor table patches integrated
I've integrated patches from Chris and Martin into the -mm tree. I'll
be sending out the patches shortly after testing with my (still in
progress!) Linux LDT test suite.
First interface quirk came up. It looks like Xen wants to return errors
from hypercalls:
+static inline int install_ldt_entry (__u32 *lp, __u32 entry_1, __u32 entry_2)
+{
+ unsigned long mach_lp =