search for: inst3

...de quiet tarmode is now full, system, hidden, noreset, quiet smb: \myinst\> tar c inst2.tar tar: dumped 632 files and directories Total bytes written: 182858240 smb: \myinst\> archive 0 smb: \myinst\> tarmode quiet tarmode is now full, system, hidden, noreset, quiet smb: \myinst\> tar c inst3.tar tar: dumped 632 files and directories Total bytes written: 182655488 smb: \myinst\> quit sgi 19% /usr/samba/bin/smbclient \\\\kiowa\\C$ -U Administrateur added interface ip=10.44.0.40 bcast=10.44.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: Domain=[IRCN] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0...

Forgive me if these questions are naive or if I'm misunderstanding something. I'm certainly very interested in seeing the MachineCopyPropagation patch finally land and stick. 1. Wouldn't function live-ins and reserved registers have started life as physical registers already? For example, wouldn't a live-in be a copy from a physical register to a virtual one allowing the flag to

On Jul 8, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > ********** EXPANDING POST-RA PSEUDO INSTRS ********** > ********** Function: main > real copy: %R15<def> = COPY %R4, %D2<imp-use,kill>, %D7<imp-use,kill>, > %D7<imp-def> > replaced by: %R15<def> = TFR %R4, %D7<imp-def> > > The R4 is a subreg of D2 double

Hello everyone, I am running into an obscure issue with ExpandPostRA. Does anyone recognizes the following: The pass replaces a real copy with a "transfer" instruction: ********** EXPANDING POST-RA PSEUDO INSTRS ********** ********** Function: main real copy: %R15<def> = COPY %R4, %D2<imp-use,kill>, %D7<imp-use,kill>, %D7<imp-def> replaced by: