search for: insoluable

.... Problem: keywords are not useful at the moment. Solution: make better list of keywords available and encourage people to use it. Problem: people won't unless there is a strong incentive, plus good keywording requires considerable expertise (especially in bulding up list). This is probably insoluable unless one person systematically keywords all of the base packages. * Some functions aren't documented (eg. simulate.lm, formula.glm) - typically, these are methods where the documentation is in the generic. Solution: these methods should all be aliased to the generic (by default?), and R CM...

.... Problem: keywords are not useful at the moment. Solution: make better list of keywords available and encourage people to use it. Problem: people won't unless there is a strong incentive, plus good keywording requires considerable expertise (especially in bulding up list). This is probably insoluable unless one person systematically keywords all of the base packages. * Some functions aren't documented (eg. simulate.lm, formula.glm) - typically, these are methods where the documentation is in the generic. Solution: these methods should all be aliased to the generic (by default?), and R CM...

...nt. Solution: make better list > of keywords > > available and encourage people to use it. Problem: people won't > > unless there is a strong incentive, plus good keywording requires > > considerable expertise (especially in bulding up list). This is > > probably insoluable unless one person systematically keywords all of > > the base packages. > > I think it is worse than that. There are concepts in > packages that just > don't arise in base R, and hence there would be no keywords for them > other than "misc", even if someone r...

...nt. Solution: make better list > of keywords > > available and encourage people to use it. Problem: people won't > > unless there is a strong incentive, plus good keywording requires > > considerable expertise (especially in bulding up list). This is > > probably insoluable unless one person systematically keywords all of > > the base packages. > > I think it is worse than that. There are concepts in > packages that just > don't arise in base R, and hence there would be no keywords for them > other than "misc", even if someone r...